Shalini vs R. Vinayak V. Shenoy — 762/2024
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/s166. Status: A.D.R.. Next hearing: 14th March 2026.
M.V.C. - ACCIDENT CLAIM CASES U/R MOTOR VEHICLES ACT
CNR: KAUP200008652024
Next Hearing
14th March 2026
Filing Number
762/2024
Filing Date
06-08-2024
Registration No
762/2024
Registration Date
02-09-2024
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ACJM, KARKALA
Judge
801-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ACJM
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shalini
Adv. NAGESH V. PAI
Respondent(s)
R. Vinayak V. Shenoy
The Branch Manager, United India Insurance Company Ltd.,Karkala
Hearing History
Judge: 801-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ACJM
A.D.R.
EVIDENCE
ORDERS
SUMMONS
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | A.D.R. |
| 17-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 23-12-2025 | ORDERS |
| 22-12-2025 | SUMMONS |
| 22-11-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY The Court allowed the petitioner's application for condonation of delay in filing a motor vehicle compensation petition. The petition was filed 1 year and 76 days beyond the standard 6-month limitation period, but the court held that since an FIR was registered within six months of the accident, the Motor Vehicles Act (being beneficial legislation) permits delay condonation to ensure accident victims receive just compensation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY The Court allowed the petitioner's application for condonation of delay in filing a motor vehicle compensation petition. The petition was filed 1 year and 76 days beyond the standard 6-month limitation period, but the court held that since an FIR was registered within six months of the accident, the Motor Vehicles Act (being beneficial legislation) permits delay condonation to ensure accident victims receive just compensation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts