Baby Poojarthi vs R. Vinayak V. Shenoy — 763/2024

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/s166. Status: A.D.R.. Next hearing: 14th March 2026.

A.D.R. Next hearing 14-Mar-2026 this date has passed

M.V.C. - ACCIDENT CLAIM CASES U/R MOTOR VEHICLES ACT

CNR: KAUP200008612024

Filing Number

763/2024

Filing Date

06-Aug-2024

Registration No

763/2024

Registration Date

02-Sep-2024

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ACJM, KARKALA

Judge

801-Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm

Last updated 12-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section U/s166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Baby Poojarthi

    Adv. NAGESH V. PAI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.R. Vinayak V. Shenoy

  2. 2.The Branch Manager, United India Insurance Company Ltd.,Karkala

Case History

  1. 14-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    A.D.R.

    Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm

  3. 17-Jan-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Summary: The Senior Civil Judge at Karkala allowed the application and condoned the delay of 1 year and 76 days in filing the motor vehicle compensation petition by Smt. Baby Poojarthi. The petitioner had sought compensation for injuries sustained in a road traffic accident, claiming the delay was due to false assurances from the auto-rickshaw driver that he would file the claim. The court applied the beneficial interpretation of the Motor Vehicles Act 2019, noting that since an FIR was lodged within six months of the accident (the statutory requirement), the petition could be entertained beyond the standard six-month limitation period for filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 17-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm

  5. 23-Dec-2025

    Orders

    Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm

  6. 22-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm

  7. 22-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm

  8. 25-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm

  9. 13-Sep-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm

  10. 30-Aug-2025

    A.D.R.

    Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm

  11. 12-Jul-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm

  12. 03-Jun-2025

    IssueView PDF

  13. 03-Jun-2025

    A.D.R.

    Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm

  14. 30-May-2025

    Issues

    Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm

  15. 28-May-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm

  16. 29-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm

  17. 22-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm

  18. 30-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm

  19. 27-Dec-2024

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm

  20. 26-Nov-2024

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm

  21. 26-Oct-2024

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm

  22. 08-Oct-2024

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm

  23. 11-Sep-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  24. 06-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 763/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Senior Civil Judge at Karkala allowed the application and condoned the delay of 1 year and 76 days in filing the motor vehicle compensation petition by Smt. Baby Poojarthi. The petitioner had sought compensation for injuries sustained in a road traffic accident, claiming the delay was due to false assurances from the auto-rickshaw driver that he would file the claim. The court applied the beneficial interpretation of the Motor Vehicles Act 2019, noting that since an FIR was lodged within six months of the accident (the statutory requirement), the petition could be entertained beyond the standard six-month limitation period for filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case