Baby Poojarthi vs R. Vinayak V. Shenoy — 763/2024
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/s166. Status: A.D.R.. Next hearing: 14th March 2026.
M.V.C. - ACCIDENT CLAIM CASES U/R MOTOR VEHICLES ACT
CNR: KAUP200008612024
Next Hearing
14th March 2026
Filing Number
763/2024
Filing Date
06-08-2024
Registration No
763/2024
Registration Date
02-09-2024
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ACJM, KARKALA
Judge
801-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ACJM
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Baby Poojarthi
Adv. NAGESH V. PAI
Respondent(s)
R. Vinayak V. Shenoy
The Branch Manager, United India Insurance Company Ltd.,Karkala
Hearing History
Judge: 801-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ACJM
A.D.R.
EVIDENCE
ORDERS
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | A.D.R. |
| 17-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 23-12-2025 | ORDERS |
| 22-12-2025 | EVIDENCE |
| 22-11-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Senior Civil Judge at Karkala allowed the application and condoned the delay of 1 year and 76 days in filing the motor vehicle compensation petition by Smt. Baby Poojarthi. The petitioner had sought compensation for injuries sustained in a road traffic accident, claiming the delay was due to false assurances from the auto-rickshaw driver that he would file the claim. The court applied the beneficial interpretation of the Motor Vehicles Act 2019, noting that since an FIR was lodged within six months of the accident (the statutory requirement), the petition could be entertained beyond the standard six-month limitation period for filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Senior Civil Judge at Karkala allowed the application and condoned the delay of 1 year and 76 days in filing the motor vehicle compensation petition by Smt. Baby Poojarthi. The petitioner had sought compensation for injuries sustained in a road traffic accident, claiming the delay was due to false assurances from the auto-rickshaw driver that he would file the claim. The court applied the beneficial interpretation of the Motor Vehicles Act 2019, noting that since an FIR was lodged within six months of the accident (the statutory requirement), the petition could be entertained beyond the standard six-month limitation period for filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts