Baby Poojarthi vs R. Vinayak V. Shenoy — 763/2024

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/s166. Status: A.D.R.. Next hearing: 14th March 2026.

M.V.C. - ACCIDENT CLAIM CASES U/R MOTOR VEHICLES ACT

CNR: KAUP200008612024

A.D.R.

Next Hearing

14th March 2026

Filing Number

763/2024

Filing Date

06-08-2024

Registration No

763/2024

Registration Date

02-09-2024

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ACJM, KARKALA

Judge

801-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ACJM

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section U/s166

Petitioner(s)

Baby Poojarthi

Adv. NAGESH V. PAI

Respondent(s)

R. Vinayak V. Shenoy

The Branch Manager, United India Insurance Company Ltd.,Karkala

Hearing History

Judge: 801-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ACJM

06-03-2026

A.D.R.

17-01-2026

EVIDENCE

23-12-2025

ORDERS

22-12-2025

EVIDENCE

22-11-2025

EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

03-06-2025
Issue
17-01-2026
Orders

Summary: The Senior Civil Judge at Karkala allowed the application and condoned the delay of 1 year and 76 days in filing the motor vehicle compensation petition by Smt. Baby Poojarthi. The petitioner had sought compensation for injuries sustained in a road traffic accident, claiming the delay was due to false assurances from the auto-rickshaw driver that he would file the claim. The court applied the beneficial interpretation of the Motor Vehicles Act 2019, noting that since an FIR was lodged within six months of the accident (the statutory requirement), the petition could be entertained beyond the standard six-month limitation period for filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Senior Civil Judge at Karkala allowed the application and condoned the delay of 1 year and 76 days in filing the motor vehicle compensation petition by Smt. Baby Poojarthi. The petitioner had sought compensation for injuries sustained in a road traffic accident, claiming the delay was due to false assurances from the auto-rickshaw driver that he would file the claim. The court applied the beneficial interpretation of the Motor Vehicles Act 2019, noting that since an FIR was lodged within six months of the accident (the statutory requirement), the petition could be entertained beyond the standard six-month limitation period for filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ACJM, KARKALA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case