Shekara Nalke vs Suresh .S — 1225/2023
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/s166. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 25th March 2026.
M.V.C. - ACCIDENT CLAIM CASES U/R MOTOR VEHICLES ACT
CNR: KAUP200007062023
Next Hearing
25th March 2026
Filing Number
1225/2023
Filing Date
07-12-2023
Registration No
1225/2023
Registration Date
19-12-2023
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ACJM, KARKALA
Judge
801-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ACJM
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shekara Nalke
Adv. SUNIL S MOOLYA
Respondent(s)
Suresh .S
Dayananda H.M.
Division Manager Magma HDI General Insurance Co.Ltd Bangalore
Hearing History
Judge: 801-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ACJM
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
SUMMONS
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 28-02-2026 | SUMMONS |
| 20-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 06-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: MVC 1225/2023 | Court: Senior Civil Judge & Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karkal | Date: 01.12.2025 Outcome: Witness testimony (PW-3) recorded in a motor vehicle accident case. The witness, an Insurance Surveyor (B.K. Padmanabh, age 77), testified regarding inspection of vehicle KA 15 EM-2922 and submitted a detailed inspection report. During cross-examination, the witness clarified limitations in determining pre-accident vehicle condition, insurance value, damage percentage, and cause of damage, while maintaining the accident conclusion was supported by documentary evidence. The court admitted the witness statement and marked relevant documents as evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: MVC 1225/2023 | Court: Senior Civil Judge & Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karkal | Date: 01.12.2025 Outcome: Witness testimony (PW-3) recorded in a motor vehicle accident case. The witness, an Insurance Surveyor (B.K. Padmanabh, age 77), testified regarding inspection of vehicle KA 15 EM-2922 and submitted a detailed inspection report. During cross-examination, the witness clarified limitations in determining pre-accident vehicle condition, insurance value, damage percentage, and cause of damage, while maintaining the accident conclusion was supported by documentary evidence. The court admitted the witness statement and marked relevant documents as evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts