Shekara Nalke vs Suresh .S — 1225/2023
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/s166. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 25th March 2026.
M.V.C. - ACCIDENT CLAIM CASES U/R MOTOR VEHICLES ACT
CNR: KAUP200007062023
Filing Number
1225/2023
Filing Date
07-Dec-2023
Registration No
1225/2023
Registration Date
19-Dec-2023
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ACJM, KARKALA
Judge
801-Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
Last updated 12-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shekara Nalke
Adv. SUNIL S MOOLYA
Respondent(s)
-
1.Suresh .S
-
2.Dayananda H.M.
-
3.Division Manager Magma HDI General Insurance Co.Ltd Bangalore
Case History
-
25-Mar-2026
Next hearingPending
-
12-Mar-2026
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
06-Mar-2026
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
28-Feb-2026
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
20-Feb-2026
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
06-Feb-2026
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
17-Jan-2026
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
13-Dec-2025
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
01-Dec-2025
DepositionView PDF
Court Order Summary Case: MVC 1225/2023 | Court: Senior Civil Judge & Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karkal | Date: 01.12.2025 Outcome: Witness testimony (PW-3) recorded in a motor vehicle accident case. The witness, an Insurance Surveyor (B.K. Padmanabh, age 77), testified regarding inspection of vehicle KA 15 EM-2922 and submitted a detailed inspection report. During cross-examination, the witness clarified limitations in determining pre-accident vehicle condition, insurance value, damage percentage, and cause of damage, while maintaining the accident conclusion was supported by documentary evidence. The court admitted the witness statement and marked relevant documents as evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Dec-2025
A.D.R.
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
19-Nov-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
06-Nov-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
10-Oct-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
30-Sep-2025
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
20-Aug-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
11-Aug-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
25-Jul-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
25-Jul-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
30-Jun-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
17-Jun-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
20-May-2025
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
25-Apr-2025
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
21-Mar-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
15-Mar-2025
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
18-Feb-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
18-Jan-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
12-Dec-2024
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
07-Dec-2024
DepositionView PDF
-
07-Dec-2024
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
05-Oct-2024
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
21-Sep-2024
Appearance Of Party
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
24-Aug-2024
Appearance Of Party
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
03-Aug-2024
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
02-Aug-2024
Orders
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
29-Jun-2024
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
14-Jun-2024
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
14-May-2024
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
20-Apr-2024
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
22-Mar-2024
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
02-Mar-2024
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
09-Feb-2024
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
28-Dec-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Dec-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 1225/2023
Court Order Summary Case: MVC 1225/2023 | Court: Senior Civil Judge & Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karkal | Date: 01.12.2025 Outcome: Witness testimony (PW-3) recorded in a motor vehicle accident case. The witness, an Insurance Surveyor (B.K. Padmanabh, age 77), testified regarding inspection of vehicle KA 15 EM-2922 and submitted a detailed inspection report. During cross-examination, the witness clarified limitations in determining pre-accident vehicle condition, insurance value, damage percentage, and cause of damage, while maintaining the accident conclusion was supported by documentary evidence. The court admitted the witness statement and marked relevant documents as evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts