Jagannatha Poojary vs The Proprietor, M/s. SNC Power Corporation Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore. — 708/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/Sec.166. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 04th April 2026.
M.V.C. - ACCIDENT CLAIM CASES U/R MOTOR VEHICLES ACT
CNR: KAUP200006792025
Next Hearing
04th April 2026
Filing Number
708/2025
Filing Date
20-08-2025
Registration No
708/2025
Registration Date
02-09-2025
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ACJM, KARKALA
Judge
801-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ACJM
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Jagannatha Poojary
Adv. NAGESH V. PAI
Respondent(s)
The Proprietor, M/s. SNC Power Corporation Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore.
New India Insurance Company Ltd.
Hearing History
Judge: 801-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ACJM
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
SUMMONS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 30-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 09-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 03-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 13-12-2025 | SUMMONS |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a deposition sheet (Form No. 4, R.P.52) from a motor vehicle accident case (MVC 708/2025) in the Senior Civil Judge's Court, Karkal. The document records the testimony of PW1 (first prosecution witness), a 69-year-old daily wage laborer, given on 03.01.2026. The plaintiff's counsel submitted 14 marked exhibits including medical records, bills, and statements, seeking compensation for injuries sustained in the accident. The defendant's counsel cross-examined, challenging the accident circumstances, injury severity, and claimed expenses, ultimately arguing the defendant is not liable for compensation. The document is a testimony record, not a final judgment or order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a deposition sheet (Form No. 4, R.P.52) from a motor vehicle accident case (MVC 708/2025) in the Senior Civil Judge's Court, Karkal. The document records the testimony of PW1 (first prosecution witness), a 69-year-old daily wage laborer, given on 03.01.2026. The plaintiff's counsel submitted 14 marked exhibits including medical records, bills, and statements, seeking compensation for injuries sustained in the accident. The defendant's counsel cross-examined, challenging the accident circumstances, injury severity, and claimed expenses, ultimately arguing the defendant is not liable for compensation. The document is a testimony record, not a final judgment or order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts