The State of Karnataka, The S.H.O. Ajekar P.S. vs SADANANDA — 231/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2), 351(2), 352, 74. Status: SUMMONS. Next hearing: 04th April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAUP200005202025
Next Hearing
04th April 2026
e-Filing Number
25-07-2025
Filing Number
231/2025
Filing Date
24-07-2025
Registration No
231/2025
Registration Date
28-07-2025
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ACJM, KARKALA
Judge
801-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ACJM
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Karnataka, The S.H.O. Ajekar P.S.
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
SADANANDA
Hearing History
Judge: 801-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ACJM
SUMMONS
SUMMONS
EVIDENCE
APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED
APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | SUMMONS |
| 27-02-2026 | SUMMONS |
| 06-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 09-01-2026 | APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED |
| 03-01-2026 | APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED |
Interim Orders
This document is a deposition sheet (Form No. 4, R.P.52) from the Senior Civil Judge's Court in Karkal, Karnataka, dated 27.02.2026, in case CC 231/2025. The witness (PW-1), a 29-year-old woman named Mallika, testified about allegations of physical assault and abusive language by the accused. During cross-examination, the defense counsel challenged her account, suggesting she fabricated the incident out of family settlement with the accused. The witness maintained her testimony and denied giving false evidence under pressure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document is a deposition sheet (Form No. 4, R.P.52) from the Senior Civil Judge's Court in Karkal, Karnataka, dated 27.02.2026, in case CC 231/2025. The witness (PW-1), a 29-year-old woman named Mallika, testified about allegations of physical assault and abusive language by the accused. During cross-examination, the defense counsel challenged her account, suggesting she fabricated the incident out of family settlement with the accused. The witness maintained her testimony and denied giving false evidence under pressure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts