The State vs SYED MOHAMMED BASHEER — 11/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 380,457. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 13th March 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAUP200002702024

EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

13th March 2026

e-Filing Number

19-04-2021

Filing Number

11/2024

Filing Date

05-06-2024

Registration No

11/2024

Registration Date

05-06-2024

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ACJM, KARKALA

Judge

801-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ACJM

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 380,457

Petitioner(s)

The State

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

SYED MOHAMMED BASHEER

UMMER FAROOQ

ABDUL LATHEEF

Hearing History

Judge: 801-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ACJM

06-03-2026

EVIDENCE

30-01-2026

EVIDENCE

26-12-2025

EVIDENCE

28-11-2025

EVIDENCE

31-10-2025

EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

11-07-2024
Charge
25-10-2024
Deposition
25-10-2024
Deposition
25-10-2024
Deposition
22-11-2024
Deposition
22-11-2024
Deposition
31-01-2025
Deposition
14-03-2025
Deposition
14-03-2025
Deposition
28-03-2025
Deposition
28-03-2025
Deposition
28-03-2025
Deposition
02-05-2025
Deposition
02-05-2025
Deposition
30-05-2025
Deposition

This document is a Deposition Sheet (witness examination record) from a Senior Civil Judge and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate court in Karkal, dated 30.05.2025 in case CC 11/2024. The witness B. Shubhakar (58-year-old PSI at Ajjekaru Police Station) testified regarding investigation proceedings, and cross-examination arguments were heard from the accused's counsel regarding investigation methodology and evidence collection. The court accepted the witness deposition and examination proceedings were completed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This document is a Deposition Sheet (witness examination record) from a Senior Civil Judge and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate court in Karkal, dated 30.05.2025 in case CC 11/2024. The witness B. Shubhakar (58-year-old PSI at Ajjekaru Police Station) testified regarding investigation proceedings, and cross-examination arguments were heard from the accused's counsel regarding investigation methodology and evidence collection. The court accepted the witness deposition and examination proceedings were completed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ACJM, KARKALA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case