Rathnamma vs Namiraja Pandi Advocate - M. K. VIJAYA KUMAR — 67/2017
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Section26,OrderVII,Rule1. Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 16th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAUP200002662017
Next Hearing
16th March 2026
Filing Number
67/2017
Filing Date
01-07-2017
Registration No
67/2017
Registration Date
03-07-2017
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ACJM, KARKALA
Judge
801-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ACJM
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rathnamma
Adv. M CHIDANANDA KEDILAYA
Saraswathi
Surekha
Sujetha
Respondent(s)
Namiraja Pandi Advocate - M. K. VIJAYA KUMAR
Vijaya
Shreesha
Shrikanth
Sunil
Sudhir Kumar
Adv. SHIVANANDA NAYAK
Achutha Shivappa Shetty
Adv. G. MURALIDHAR BHAT
Hearing History
Judge: 801-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ACJM
ARGUMENTS
EVIDENCE
ORDERS
ARGUMENTS
SUMMONS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 10-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 07-03-2026 | ORDERS |
| 06-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 05-03-2026 | SUMMONS |
Interim Orders
Summary In a property partition suit (O.S. No.67/2017), the Senior Civil Judge granted all three interlinked applications filed by the plaintiffs: IA 37 to recall witness PW 2, IA 38 to reopen the case, and IA 39 to receive late-filed documents. The court condoned the delay in producing documents, reopened the proceedings from arguments stage back to plaintiffs' evidence, and recalled PW 2 for further examination—while imposing Rs. 6,000 cost on the plaintiffs to compensate the defendants for the delay caused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In a property partition suit (O.S. No.67/2017), the Senior Civil Judge granted all three interlinked applications filed by the plaintiffs: IA 37 to recall witness PW 2, IA 38 to reopen the case, and IA 39 to receive late-filed documents. The court condoned the delay in producing documents, reopened the proceedings from arguments stage back to plaintiffs' evidence, and recalled PW 2 for further examination—while imposing Rs. 6,000 cost on the plaintiffs to compensate the defendants for the delay caused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts