Balakrishna Shetty vs Shobha R. Shetty — 4/2020
Case under Order 20 Rule 18 Section Section 54, and 151. Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 24th March 2026.
FDP - FINAL DECREE PROCEEDINGS
CNR: KAUP200001842020
Next Hearing
24th March 2026
Filing Number
4/2020
Filing Date
20-02-2020
Registration No
4/2020
Registration Date
24-02-2020
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ACJM, KARKALA
Judge
801-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ACJM
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Balakrishna Shetty
Adv. M. K. VIJAYA KUMAR
Indira P. Shetty
Respondent(s)
Shobha R. Shetty
Harinakshi A Shetty
Jagdish Shetty
Subhas Shetty
Shakunthala Shetty
Shantha Shetty
Malashri
Pushpa Shetty
Harisha P. Shetty
Hearing History
Judge: 801-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ACJM
ARGUMENTS
SUMMONS
ORDERS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 25-02-2026 | SUMMONS |
| 04-02-2026 | ORDERS |
| 03-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 02-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY The Senior Civil Judge of Karkala ruled on two leftover issues in a property division case. The court found that respondent No.5 (Shakunthala) proved she made substantial improvements to the suit property, spending over Rs.25 lakhs on agricultural development and house repairs, and is therefore entitled to allotment of the house and surrounding land under equity. Additionally, respondents No.4 and 5 are directed to render proper accounts of the income/yields from the suit properties, as they are in possession and enjoyment of the agricultural land. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY The Senior Civil Judge of Karkala ruled on two leftover issues in a property division case. The court found that respondent No.5 (Shakunthala) proved she made substantial improvements to the suit property, spending over Rs.25 lakhs on agricultural development and house repairs, and is therefore entitled to allotment of the house and surrounding land under equity. Additionally, respondents No.4 and 5 are directed to render proper accounts of the income/yields from the suit properties, as they are in possession and enjoyment of the agricultural land. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts