Ruthvika Rep by her mother Hamsa vs Ravindra Shetty — 127/2023
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Status: Summons. Next hearing: 18th March 2026.
M.V.C. - ACCIDENT CLAIM CASES U/R MOTOR VEHICLES ACT
CNR: KAUP200001282023
Filing Number
127/2023
Filing Date
25-Jan-2023
Registration No
127/2023
Registration Date
16-Feb-2023
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ACJM, KARKALA
Judge
801-Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
Last updated 12-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ruthvika Rep by her mother Hamsa
Adv. ANANDA RAMAKRISHNA.RAO K
-
2.Megharaj
-
3.Shararn Raj
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ravindra Shetty
-
2.The Branch Manager, United India Insurance Co Ltd., Karkala
Case History
-
18-Mar-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
Summary: This is a civil court order (MVC 127/2023) dated 06.03.2026 from a court in Karnataka, India. The court examined PW-1 (witness) under oath regarding a case involving injuries to the witness's daughter caused by a vehicle accident. The court found that the witness's petition for compensation was filed beyond the prescribed time limit; however, the court noted that the witness was unaware of the legal requirement to consult a lawyer and that the delay was not intentional, thus holding the witness entitled to compensation despite the late filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Mar-2026
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
17-Jan-2026
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
13-Dec-2025
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
09-Dec-2025
A.D.R.
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
11-Nov-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
18-Oct-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
27-Sep-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
27-Sep-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
12-Sep-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
02-Aug-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
28-Jun-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
13-Jun-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
13-Jun-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
24-Apr-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
20-Mar-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
08-Mar-2025
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
18-Jan-2025
A.D.R.
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
14-Dec-2024
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
16-Nov-2024
A.D.R.
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
07-Oct-2024
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
30-Sep-2024
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
28-Sep-2024
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
14-Sep-2024
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
30-Aug-2024
A.D.R.
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
19-Jul-2024
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
28-Jun-2024
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
19-Apr-2024
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
16-Mar-2024
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
09-Mar-2024
A.D.R.
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
09-Feb-2024
A.D.R.
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
20-Dec-2023
IssueView PDF
-
20-Dec-2023
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
15-Dec-2023
Issues
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
07-Dec-2023
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
24-Nov-2023
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
06-Oct-2023
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
09-Sep-2023
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
11-Aug-2023
A.D.R.
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
17-Jul-2023
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
14-Jul-2023
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
12-Jun-2023
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
12-May-2023
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
31-Mar-2023
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
24-Mar-2023
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm
-
20-Feb-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Jan-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 127/2023
Summary: This is a civil court order (MVC 127/2023) dated 06.03.2026 from a court in Karnataka, India. The court examined PW-1 (witness) under oath regarding a case involving injuries to the witness's daughter caused by a vehicle accident. The court found that the witness's petition for compensation was filed beyond the prescribed time limit; however, the court noted that the witness was unaware of the legal requirement to consult a lawyer and that the delay was not intentional, thus holding the witness entitled to compensation despite the late filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts