Manjunatha Shetty vs Mahabala Shetty — 173/2024

Case under Civil Procedure Code 1908 Section U/S.26,OR.VII,RU.1. Status: STEPS. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAUP020048422024

STEPS

Next Hearing

16th April 2026

Filing Number

173/2024

Filing Date

16-10-2024

Registration No

173/2024

Registration Date

23-10-2024

Court

PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM COURT, UDUPI

Judge

508-PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM UDUPI

Acts & Sections

Civil Procedure Code 1908 Section U/S.26,OR.VII,RU.1

Petitioner(s)

Manjunatha Shetty

Adv. SMT. VANI V. RAO

Govindaraj Shetty

Shobha R Shetty

Gowri Shedthi

Priya Shetty

Prathima

Pramoda

Shakuntala Shetty

Dharmendra Shetty

Sandhya

Sumithra Shetty

Subhas Shetty

Sowmya Shetty

Respondent(s)

Mahabala Shetty

Krishnappa Shetty

Korgu

Sundar

Jayakara

Udaya

Girijaya

Gubbi

Gulabi

Sumithra

Baby

Babi

Sahadevi

Srinivas

Vanaja

Santhosh

Prema

Sudhakara

Sathish

Narayana Shetty

Hearing History

Judge: 508-PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM UDUPI

06-03-2026

STEPS

10-02-2026

EVIDENCE

29-01-2026

EVIDENCE

03-01-2026

EVIDENCE

10-12-2025

EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

04-06-2025
Issue
19-09-2025
Deposition

In O.S.-173/2024 heard on 19-09-2025, the court admitted various documents including Land Tribunal orders, death certificates, and survey records as evidence (marked as exhibits NIP-1 through NIP-17). The plaintiff's counsel sought favorable judgment on the suit, while the defendant's counsel was granted time to file a reply. The witness examination was recorded through the court's notes, and the case stands adjourned pending the defendant's response. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

In O.S.-173/2024 heard on 19-09-2025, the court admitted various documents including Land Tribunal orders, death certificates, and survey records as evidence (marked as exhibits NIP-1 through NIP-17). The plaintiff's counsel sought favorable judgment on the suit, while the defendant's counsel was granted time to file a reply. The witness examination was recorded through the court's notes, and the case stands adjourned pending the defendant's response. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM COURT, UDUPI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case