Prathvik Naik vs Yallappa Hadappa — 1121/2023
Case under Indian Motor Vehicle Act 1988 Section 166. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAUP020045262023
Filing Number
1121/2023
Filing Date
04-Nov-2023
Registration No
1121/2023
Registration Date
20-Nov-2023
Court
PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM COURT, UDUPI
Judge
508-Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
Last updated 12-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Prathvik Naik
Adv. ANIL KUMAR
-
2.Malathi S
Respondent(s)
-
1.Yallappa Hadappa
-
2.The Divisional Manager, Shri Ram General Insurance Company Ltd.,Mangalore
Case History
-
10-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Hearing
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
10-Feb-2026
Objections
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
02-Feb-2026
DepositionView PDF
Summary: This is a Motor Vehicle Claim (MVC) case no. 1121/2023 heard on 02-02-2026. The court examined witness testimony and considered documentary evidence (Authorization letter and Policy document) submitted by the petitioner. The petition has been dismissed as the court found the petitioner's claims regarding liability and compensation untenable under the Limitation Act and applicable legal provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Feb-2026
Arguments
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
24-Jan-2026
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
17-Jan-2026
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
05-Jan-2026
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
26-Dec-2025
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
13-Dec-2025
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
11-Nov-2025
A.D.R.
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
29-Oct-2025
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
26-Sep-2025
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
29-Aug-2025
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
23-Jul-2025
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
04-Jul-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
04-Jul-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
04-Jul-2025
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
24-Jun-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
24-Jun-2025
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
04-Jun-2025
IssueView PDF
-
04-Jun-2025
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
23-Apr-2025
OrdersView PDF
-
23-Apr-2025
Hearing
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
29-Mar-2025
Hearing
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
11-Mar-2025
Hearing
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
10-Mar-2025
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
01-Mar-2025
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
07-Feb-2025
Enquiry
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
04-Jan-2025
Enquiry
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
02-Jan-2025
Hearing
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
07-Dec-2024
Hearing
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
25-Nov-2024
Hearing
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
19-Oct-2024
Hearing
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
04-Oct-2024
Hearing
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
24-Sep-2024
Orders
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
20-Sep-2024
Objections
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
12-Sep-2024
Objections
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
21-Aug-2024
Objections
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
20-Jul-2024
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
20-Jun-2024
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
08-May-2024
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
02-May-2024
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
01-Apr-2024
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
15-Mar-2024
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
13-Feb-2024
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
12-Jan-2024
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
28-Nov-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Nov-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 1121/2023
Summary: This is a Motor Vehicle Claim (MVC) case no. 1121/2023 heard on 02-02-2026. The court examined witness testimony and considered documentary evidence (Authorization letter and Policy document) submitted by the petitioner. The petition has been dismissed as the court found the petitioner's claims regarding liability and compensation untenable under the Limitation Act and applicable legal provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts