Ramesh vs Kerekon Vinayak Advocate - VISHWANATHA SHETTY — 743/2024

Case under Indian Motor Vehicle Act 1988 Section U/s166. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 06th April 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 06-Apr-2026 this date has passed

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KAUP020039582024

Filing Number

743/2024

Filing Date

02-Aug-2024

Registration No

743/2024

Registration Date

23-Aug-2024

Court

PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM COURT, UDUPI

Judge

602-I Addl Sr Civil Judge and Acjm Udupi

Last updated 12-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Motor Vehicle Act 1988 Section U/s166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ramesh

    Adv. SANKAPPA A.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kerekon Vinayak Advocate - VISHWANATHA SHETTY

  2. 2.The Divisional Manager, ICICI Lombard General Ins.Co.Ltd.,Mangalore

    Adv. DINESH B.SHETTY

Case History

  1. 06-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    I Addl Sr Civil Judge and Acjm Udupi

  3. 02-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    I Addl Sr Civil Judge and Acjm Udupi

  4. 28-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    I Addl Sr Civil Judge and Acjm Udupi

  5. 21-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    I Addl Sr Civil Judge and Acjm Udupi

  6. 10-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary Case No.: M.V.C 743/2024 Order Date: 10-02-2026 Outcome: The court examined the petitioner's disability assessment certificate and found discrepancies in the disability determination. The court rejected the claim that the petitioner had no disability, noting that medical records show 30.2% disability was assessed. The court held that the hospital discharge certificate and disability certificate were issued based on actual medical examination and treatment provided, and the petitioner's employment was not considered in determining disability. The case proceeded with witness examination and evidence recording on the specified date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 10-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    I Addl Sr Civil Judge and Acjm Udupi

  8. 12-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    I Addl Sr Civil Judge and Acjm Udupi

  9. 11-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl Sr Civil Judge and Acjm Udupi

  10. 29-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl Sr Civil Judge and Acjm Udupi

  11. 24-Oct-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  12. 24-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl Sr Civil Judge and Acjm Udupi

  13. 13-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl Sr Civil Judge and Acjm Udupi

  14. 02-Sep-2025

    IssueView PDF

  15. 02-Sep-2025

    A.D.R.

    I Addl Sr Civil Judge and Acjm Udupi

  16. 11-Aug-2025

    Issues

    I Addl Sr Civil Judge and Acjm Udupi

  17. 04-Jul-2025

    Written Statement

    I Addl Sr Civil Judge and Acjm Udupi

  18. 21-Jun-2025

    Written Statement

    I Addl Sr Civil Judge and Acjm Udupi

  19. 09-Jun-2025

    Written Statement

    I Addl Sr Civil Judge and Acjm Udupi

  20. 22-Apr-2025

    Written Statement

    I Addl Sr Civil Judge and Acjm Udupi

  21. 06-Mar-2025

    Written Statement

    I Addl Sr Civil Judge and Acjm Udupi

  22. 29-Jan-2025

    Notice

    I Addl Sr Civil Judge and Acjm Udupi

  23. 09-Jan-2025

    Notice

    I Addl Sr Civil Judge and Acjm Udupi

  24. 19-Nov-2024

    Notice

    I Addl Sr Civil Judge and Acjm Udupi

  25. 16-Oct-2024

    Notice

    I Addl Sr Civil Judge and Acjm Udupi

  26. 29-Aug-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  27. 02-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 743/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case No.: M.V.C 743/2024 Order Date: 10-02-2026 Outcome: The court examined the petitioner's disability assessment certificate and found discrepancies in the disability determination. The court rejected the claim that the petitioner had no disability, noting that medical records show 30.2% disability was assessed. The court held that the hospital discharge certificate and disability certificate were issued based on actual medical examination and treatment provided, and the petitioner's employment was not considered in determining disability. The case proceeded with witness examination and evidence recording on the specified date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case