Ramesh vs Kerekon Vinayak Advocate - VISHWANATHA SHETTY — 743/2024
Case under Indian Motor Vehicle Act 1988 Section U/s166. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 06th April 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAUP020039582024
Next Hearing
06th April 2026
Filing Number
743/2024
Filing Date
02-08-2024
Registration No
743/2024
Registration Date
23-08-2024
Court
PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM COURT, UDUPI
Judge
602-I Addl Sr Civil Judge and ACJM Udupi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ramesh
Adv. SANKAPPA A.
Respondent(s)
Kerekon Vinayak Advocate - VISHWANATHA SHETTY
The Divisional Manager, ICICI Lombard General Ins.Co.Ltd.,Mangalore
Adv. DINESH B.SHETTY
Hearing History
Judge: 602-I Addl Sr Civil Judge and ACJM Udupi
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 02-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 28-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 21-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 10-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case No.: M.V.C 743/2024 Order Date: 10-02-2026 Outcome: The court examined the petitioner's disability assessment certificate and found discrepancies in the disability determination. The court rejected the claim that the petitioner had no disability, noting that medical records show 30.2% disability was assessed. The court held that the hospital discharge certificate and disability certificate were issued based on actual medical examination and treatment provided, and the petitioner's employment was not considered in determining disability. The case proceeded with witness examination and evidence recording on the specified date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case No.: M.V.C 743/2024 Order Date: 10-02-2026 Outcome: The court examined the petitioner's disability assessment certificate and found discrepancies in the disability determination. The court rejected the claim that the petitioner had no disability, noting that medical records show 30.2% disability was assessed. The court held that the hospital discharge certificate and disability certificate were issued based on actual medical examination and treatment provided, and the petitioner's employment was not considered in determining disability. The case proceeded with witness examination and evidence recording on the specified date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts