The SHO of Padubidri Police Station vs Mani aliyas Manikanta — 2172/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 454,380r/w34. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAUP020037822023
Next Hearing
17th April 2026
Filing Number
2172/2023
Filing Date
16-09-2023
Registration No
2172/2023
Registration Date
16-09-2023
Court
PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM COURT, UDUPI
Judge
602-I Addl Sr Civil Judge and ACJM Udupi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The SHO (Station House Officer) of Padubidri Police Station
Adv. State by Sr. APP
Respondent(s)
Mani aliyas Manikanta
Hearing History
Judge: 602-I Addl Sr Civil Judge and ACJM Udupi
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 22-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 27-11-2025 | EVIDENCE |
| 25-09-2025 | EVIDENCE |
| 07-08-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Court: Additional Senior Civil Judge & ACJ Court, Udupi Case No: CC 2172/2023 Outcome: The witness examination (B.N. Prakash) was recorded on 25-09-2025 in a civil case involving a jewelry-related dispute. The witness testified regarding gold jewelry that was allegedly entrusted for refining/melting work around 2004, with subsequent police involvement in August 2005. The court allowed the opposing counsel (Senior Assistant Government Pleader) to cross-examine the witness partially as a hostile witness. The examination concluded with no further re-examination, and the testimony was formally recorded in court proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Court: Additional Senior Civil Judge & ACJ Court, Udupi Case No: CC 2172/2023 Outcome: The witness examination (B.N. Prakash) was recorded on 25-09-2025 in a civil case involving a jewelry-related dispute. The witness testified regarding gold jewelry that was allegedly entrusted for refining/melting work around 2004, with subsequent police involvement in August 2005. The court allowed the opposing counsel (Senior Assistant Government Pleader) to cross-examine the witness partially as a hostile witness. The examination concluded with no further re-examination, and the testimony was formally recorded in court proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts