The SHO of Padubidri Police Station vs Kumar Kunder — 1813/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,324,504,506,34. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAUP020035802024
Next Hearing
17th April 2026
e-Filing Number
18-07-2024
Filing Number
1813/2024
Filing Date
18-07-2024
Registration No
1813/2024
Registration Date
18-07-2024
Court
PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM COURT, UDUPI
Judge
602-I Addl Sr Civil Judge and ACJM Udupi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The SHO (Station House Officer) of Padubidri Police Station
Adv. Sr. APP
Respondent(s)
Kumar Kunder
Shailesh
Hearing History
Judge: 602-I Addl Sr Civil Judge and ACJM Udupi
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 23-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 19-12-2025 | EVIDENCE |
| 14-11-2025 | EVIDENCE |
| 09-10-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary of Court Order Case No.: CC:1813/2024, CW 5 PDW:2 Court: Additional Senior Civil Judge and ACJM, Udupi Date: 19-12-2025 The court completed examination of a witness (Gunapal, age 55, fisherman from Hejamadi) in a civil matter. The witness testified regarding documents and site identification, marking exhibits as material evidence. After extensive cross-examination by the prosecutor, the court found significant inconsistencies in the witness's testimony regarding his presence at the incident site, document signatures, and his involvement in the matter. The court concluded the witness examination without scheduling further cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Court Order Case No.: CC:1813/2024, CW 5 PDW:2 Court: Additional Senior Civil Judge and ACJM, Udupi Date: 19-12-2025 The court completed examination of a witness (Gunapal, age 55, fisherman from Hejamadi) in a civil matter. The witness testified regarding documents and site identification, marking exhibits as material evidence. After extensive cross-examination by the prosecutor, the court found significant inconsistencies in the witness's testimony regarding his presence at the incident site, document signatures, and his involvement in the matter. The court concluded the witness examination without scheduling further cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts