Hariyappa Kotian, Rep by his G.P.A Holder, Mr. Murali J. Shriyan vs Masood Ahammed Jaleel — 1971/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 01st April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAUP020030812025
Next Hearing
01st April 2026
Filing Number
1971/2025
Filing Date
14-10-2025
Registration No
1971/2025
Registration Date
14-10-2025
Court
PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM COURT, UDUPI
Judge
508-PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM UDUPI
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Hariyappa Kotian, Rep by his G.P.A Holder, Mr. Murali J. Shriyan
Adv. H.RAGHAVENDRA SHETTY
Respondent(s)
Masood Ahammed Jaleel
Hearing History
Judge: 508-PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM UDUPI
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED
APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 19-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 29-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 21-01-2026 | APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED |
| 20-01-2026 | APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED |
Interim Orders
This is a criminal complaint case (C.C.No.1971/2025) filed before the Principal Senior Civil Judge and CJM, Udupi, where complainant Hariyappa Kotian alleges that accused Masood Ahammed Jaleel borrowed Rs.1,73,000 and issued a cheque dated 04-04-2025 that was dishonored due to insufficient funds. The case was posted on 9th January 2026 with the accused being explained the charges under Section 223 of BNSS (Sections 138 and 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act); however, the document only shows the initial plea stage with blank responses to whether the accused understood the charges and whether he pleads guilty or has a defense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a criminal complaint case (C.C.No.1971/2025) filed before the Principal Senior Civil Judge and CJM, Udupi, where complainant Hariyappa Kotian alleges that accused Masood Ahammed Jaleel borrowed Rs.1,73,000 and issued a cheque dated 04-04-2025 that was dishonored due to insufficient funds. The case was posted on 9th January 2026 with the accused being explained the charges under Section 223 of BNSS (Sections 138 and 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act); however, the document only shows the initial plea stage with blank responses to whether the accused understood the charges and whether he pleads guilty or has a defense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts