Kaushik V. Poojary vs Macha jayaram Advocate - Dinesh C Nayak — 517/2024
Case under Indian Motor Vehicle Act 1988 Section U/s166. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 06th April 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAUP020030652024
Next Hearing
06th April 2026
Filing Number
517/2024
Filing Date
24-05-2024
Registration No
517/2024
Registration Date
02-07-2024
Court
PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM COURT, UDUPI
Judge
602-I Addl Sr Civil Judge and ACJM Udupi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kaushik V. Poojary
Adv. SANKAPPA A.
Respondent(s)
Macha jayaram Advocate - Dinesh C Nayak
The Divisional Manager, Oriental Insurance Company Ltd.,Udupi.
Adv. DINESH B.SHETTY
Hearing History
Judge: 602-I Addl Sr Civil Judge and ACJM Udupi
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 26-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 02-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 17-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 10-12-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary: In MVC 517/2024, the court examined evidence regarding medical treatment provided to the petitioner, including case records, X-rays, and treatment certificates dated 26-02-2026. The court found that the petitioner's treatment has been completed, with fractures properly healed and no disability resulting from the treatment. The court concluded that removal of an implant is not medically necessary and is at the petitioner's discretion, and dismissed the petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In MVC 517/2024, the court examined evidence regarding medical treatment provided to the petitioner, including case records, X-rays, and treatment certificates dated 26-02-2026. The court found that the petitioner's treatment has been completed, with fractures properly healed and no disability resulting from the treatment. The court concluded that removal of an implant is not medically necessary and is at the petitioner's discretion, and dismissed the petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts