Lawrence Aranha vs Manoj Jaya Bhandary Advocate - Sooda Ashwini Naveen — 672/2023
Case under Indian Motor Vehicle Act 1988 Section 166. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAUP020028152023
Filing Number
672/2023
Filing Date
11-Jul-2023
Registration No
672/2023
Registration Date
07-Aug-2023
Court
PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM COURT, UDUPI
Judge
508-Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
Last updated 12-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Lawrence Aranha
Adv. SANJAY K NILAVAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.Manoj Jaya Bhandary Advocate - Sooda Ashwini Naveen
-
2.Rohit Kumar
Adv. Sooda Ashwini Naveen
-
3.United India Insurance Company Limited, Udupi
Adv. DINESH B.SHETTY
-
4.Liberty Videocon General Insurance
Case History
-
24-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Hearing
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
05-Feb-2026
Hearing
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
07-Jan-2026
Hearing
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
29-Nov-2025
Hearing
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
07-Nov-2025
Hearing
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
14-Oct-2025
Hearing
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
20-Sep-2025
Hearing
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
21-Aug-2025
Hearing
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
17-Jul-2025
Objections
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
13-Jun-2025
Objections
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
25-Apr-2025
Objections
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
01-Apr-2025
Hearing
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
01-Mar-2025
Notice
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
01-Feb-2025
OrdersView PDF
Case Summary: In MVC 672/23, the petitioner's application under Section 151 of CPC and memo to delete the third respondent (United India Insurance Company) was allowed. The court found that United India Insurance had issued only an own damage policy, not the third-party (TP) liability policy relevant to the petitioner's compensation claim for road traffic accident injuries, which was issued by Liberty Videocon General Insurance. United India Insurance Company was accordingly deleted as a respondent, and the petitioner was directed to amend the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Feb-2025
Notice
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
28-Jan-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
28-Jan-2025
Arguments
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
10-Jan-2025
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
09-Jan-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
09-Jan-2025
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
08-Jan-2025
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
07-Dec-2024
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
16-Nov-2024
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
04-Nov-2024
DepositionView PDF
-
04-Nov-2024
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
30-Sep-2024
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
28-Sep-2024
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
11-Sep-2024
DepositionView PDF
-
11-Sep-2024
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
22-Aug-2024
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
18-Jul-2024
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
03-Jul-2024
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
12-Jun-2024
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
29-Apr-2024
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
04-Apr-2024
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
07-Mar-2024
DepositionView PDF
-
07-Mar-2024
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
09-Feb-2024
IssueView PDF
-
09-Feb-2024
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
25-Jan-2024
Issues
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
06-Jan-2024
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
06-Dec-2023
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
06-Nov-2023
Written Statement
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi
-
05-Oct-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Jul-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 672/2023
Case Summary: In MVC 672/23, the petitioner's application under Section 151 of CPC and memo to delete the third respondent (United India Insurance Company) was allowed. The court found that United India Insurance had issued only an own damage policy, not the third-party (TP) liability policy relevant to the petitioner's compensation claim for road traffic accident injuries, which was issued by Liberty Videocon General Insurance. United India Insurance Company was accordingly deleted as a respondent, and the petitioner was directed to amend the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts