Lawrence Aranha vs Manoj Jaya Bhandary Advocate - Sooda Ashwini Naveen — 672/2023
Case under Indian Motor Vehicle Act 1988 Section 166. Status: HEARING. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAUP020028152023
Next Hearing
24th April 2026
Filing Number
672/2023
Filing Date
11-07-2023
Registration No
672/2023
Registration Date
07-08-2023
Court
PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM COURT, UDUPI
Judge
508-PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM UDUPI
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Lawrence Aranha
Adv. SANJAY K NILAVAR
Respondent(s)
Manoj Jaya Bhandary Advocate - Sooda Ashwini Naveen
Rohit Kumar
Adv. Sooda Ashwini Naveen
United India Insurance Company Limited, Udupi
Adv. DINESH B.SHETTY
Liberty Videocon General Insurance
Hearing History
Judge: 508-PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM UDUPI
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 05-02-2026 | HEARING |
| 07-01-2026 | HEARING |
| 29-11-2025 | HEARING |
| 07-11-2025 | HEARING |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: In MVC 672/23, the petitioner's application under Section 151 of CPC and memo to delete the third respondent (United India Insurance Company) was allowed. The court found that United India Insurance had issued only an own damage policy, not the third-party (TP) liability policy relevant to the petitioner's compensation claim for road traffic accident injuries, which was issued by Liberty Videocon General Insurance. United India Insurance Company was accordingly deleted as a respondent, and the petitioner was directed to amend the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: In MVC 672/23, the petitioner's application under Section 151 of CPC and memo to delete the third respondent (United India Insurance Company) was allowed. The court found that United India Insurance had issued only an own damage policy, not the third-party (TP) liability policy relevant to the petitioner's compensation claim for road traffic accident injuries, which was issued by Liberty Videocon General Insurance. United India Insurance Company was accordingly deleted as a respondent, and the petitioner was directed to amend the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts