Saravanan vs Anish P.K — 701/2023
Case under Indian Motor Vehicle Act 1988 Section 166. Status: Judgement. Next hearing: 17th March 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAUP020027592023
Filing Number
701/2023
Filing Date
18-Jul-2023
Registration No
701/2023
Registration Date
07-Aug-2023
Court
PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM COURT, UDUPI
Judge
602-I Addl Sr Civil Judge and Acjm Udupi
Last updated 12-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Saravanan
Adv. SANJAY K NILAVAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.Anish P.K
-
2.Sunil John D Souza
Adv. PRADEEP P.J.
-
3.United India Insurnace Company Limited, Udupi
Adv. A. PRITHVIRAJ HEGDE
Case History
-
17-Mar-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Judgement
I Addl Sr Civil Judge and Acjm Udupi
-
27-Feb-2026
Judgement
I Addl Sr Civil Judge and Acjm Udupi
-
21-Feb-2026
Judgement
I Addl Sr Civil Judge and Acjm Udupi
-
17-Feb-2026
Arguments
I Addl Sr Civil Judge and Acjm Udupi
-
12-Feb-2026
Arguments
I Addl Sr Civil Judge and Acjm Udupi
-
09-Feb-2026
Arguments
I Addl Sr Civil Judge and Acjm Udupi
-
02-Feb-2026
Evidence
I Addl Sr Civil Judge and Acjm Udupi
-
27-Jan-2026
Evidence
I Addl Sr Civil Judge and Acjm Udupi
-
14-Jan-2026
Evidence
I Addl Sr Civil Judge and Acjm Udupi
-
30-Dec-2025
Evidence
I Addl Sr Civil Judge and Acjm Udupi
-
12-Dec-2025
DepositionView PDF
Summary In Motor Vehicles Case (MVC) 701/2023, the court examined witness testimony regarding disability assessment and medical treatment provided at KMC Hospital. The court found that the petitioner's disability claim was not substantiated as alleged and rejected the request for enhanced compensation, noting the evidence did not support the degree of permanent disability claimed. The court directed that no further relief beyond what has been established could be granted, and the case was concluded based on the evidence presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Dec-2025
Evidence
I Addl Sr Civil Judge and Acjm Udupi
-
12-Nov-2025
Evidence
I Addl Sr Civil Judge and Acjm Udupi
-
08-Oct-2025
Evidence
I Addl Sr Civil Judge and Acjm Udupi
-
11-Aug-2025
Evidence
I Addl Sr Civil Judge and Acjm Udupi
-
22-Jul-2025
Evidence
I Addl Sr Civil Judge and Acjm Udupi
-
15-Jul-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
15-Jul-2025
Evidence
I Addl Sr Civil Judge and Acjm Udupi
-
07-Jul-2025
Evidence
I Addl Sr Civil Judge and Acjm Udupi
-
28-Jun-2025
Evidence
I Addl Sr Civil Judge and Acjm Udupi
-
17-Jun-2025
Evidence
I Addl Sr Civil Judge and Acjm Udupi
-
28-Apr-2025
Hearing
I Addl Sr Civil Judge and Acjm Udupi
-
11-Apr-2025
Hearing
I Addl Sr Civil Judge and Acjm Udupi
-
05-Mar-2025
Issues
I Addl Sr Civil Judge and Acjm Udupi
-
19-Feb-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
19-Feb-2025
Evidence
I Addl Sr Civil Judge and Acjm Udupi
-
22-Jan-2025
Evidence
I Addl Sr Civil Judge and Acjm Udupi
-
13-Jan-2025
Evidence
I Addl Sr Civil Judge and Acjm Udupi
-
23-Dec-2024
Evidence
I Addl Sr Civil Judge and Acjm Udupi
-
21-Nov-2024
DepositionView PDF
-
21-Nov-2024
Evidence
I Addl Sr Civil Judge and Acjm Udupi
-
04-Nov-2024
Evidence
I Addl Sr Civil Judge and Acjm Udupi
-
21-Oct-2024
Evidence
I Addl Sr Civil Judge and Acjm Udupi
-
04-Sep-2024
Evidence
I Addl Sr Civil Judge and Acjm Udupi
-
06-Aug-2024
Evidence
I Addl Sr Civil Judge and Acjm Udupi
-
09-Jul-2024
IssueView PDF
-
09-Jul-2024
Evidence
I Addl Sr Civil Judge and Acjm Udupi
-
27-Jun-2024
Issues
I Addl Sr Civil Judge and Acjm Udupi
-
22-May-2024
OrdersView PDF
-
22-May-2024
Summons
I Addl Sr Civil Judge and Acjm Udupi
-
15-May-2024
Steps
I Addl Sr Civil Judge and Acjm Udupi
-
27-Mar-2024
Steps
I Addl Sr Civil Judge and Acjm Udupi
-
13-Mar-2024
Steps
I Addl Sr Civil Judge and Acjm Udupi
-
06-Feb-2024
Steps
I Addl Sr Civil Judge and Acjm Udupi
-
28-Dec-2023
Steps
I Addl Sr Civil Judge and Acjm Udupi
-
24-Nov-2023
Steps
I Addl Sr Civil Judge and Acjm Udupi
-
11-Oct-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Jul-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 701/2023
Summary In Motor Vehicles Case (MVC) 701/2023, the court examined witness testimony regarding disability assessment and medical treatment provided at KMC Hospital. The court found that the petitioner's disability claim was not substantiated as alleged and rejected the request for enhanced compensation, noting the evidence did not support the degree of permanent disability claimed. The court directed that no further relief beyond what has been established could be granted, and the case was concluded based on the evidence presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts