Maiyyadi vs Vedavathi — 16/2022
Case under Civil Procedure Code 1908 Section U/O.IX,RU.13. Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.
MISC. - Miscellaneous Cases
CNR: KAUP020021302022
Next Hearing
16th April 2026
Filing Number
16/2022
Filing Date
22-09-2022
Registration No
16/2022
Registration Date
26-09-2022
Court
PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM COURT, UDUPI
Judge
508-PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM UDUPI
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Maiyyadi
Adv. E.Balasubramanya Rao
U. Kishore Shetty
Respondent(s)
Vedavathi
Hemraj
Vani Prasad
Pyarelala
Premalala
Keerthana
Hearing History
Judge: 508-PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM UDUPI
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 16-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 22-01-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 18-12-2025 | ARGUMENTS |
| 02-12-2025 | ARGUMENTS |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a Miscellaneous Case (Misc. Case No. 16/2022) from the Udupi Court dated 05-03-2025. The court recorded the examination-in-chief of Witness 1 (PW-01). The witness testified regarding a civil dispute involving a contract with a deficiency in stamp fee, explaining his failure to appear in court was due to financial difficulties in arranging the required funds, and that he had informed his lawyer about the situation. The case proceedings continued with cross-examination by the opposing counsel, and no further examination was ordered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a Miscellaneous Case (Misc. Case No. 16/2022) from the Udupi Court dated 05-03-2025. The court recorded the examination-in-chief of Witness 1 (PW-01). The witness testified regarding a civil dispute involving a contract with a deficiency in stamp fee, explaining his failure to appear in court was due to financial difficulties in arranging the required funds, and that he had informed his lawyer about the situation. The case proceedings continued with cross-examination by the opposing counsel, and no further examination was ordered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts