Parven vs Jagannath Advocate - SANKAPPA A. — 426/2024
Case under Indian Motor Vehicle Act 1988 Section U/s166. Status: HEARING. Next hearing: 17th March 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAUP020020312024
Next Hearing
17th March 2026
Filing Number
425/2024
Filing Date
22-04-2024
Registration No
426/2024
Registration Date
04-06-2024
Court
PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM COURT, UDUPI
Judge
602-I Addl Sr Civil Judge and ACJM Udupi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Parven
Adv. Poornima K.
Sowmya M
Respondent(s)
Jagannath Advocate - SANKAPPA A.
The Branch Manager, Univarsal Sampo Gen.Ins.Co.Ltd,Mangalore
Adv. MADHUKESH RAI
Hearing History
Judge: 602-I Addl Sr Civil Judge and ACJM Udupi
HEARING
OBJECTIONS
OBJECTIONS
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 04-03-2026 | OBJECTIONS |
| 28-02-2026 | OBJECTIONS |
| 24-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 19-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
The court examined witness testimony on 05-02-2026 in case MVC 426/2024 and found that the accident was caused by the plaintiff's son's negligence, not the defendant's vehicle driver's fault. The court ruled that the first defendant is not liable to provide any compensation, dismissing the plaintiff's claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court examined witness testimony on 05-02-2026 in case MVC 426/2024 and found that the accident was caused by the plaintiff's son's negligence, not the defendant's vehicle driver's fault. The court ruled that the first defendant is not liable to provide any compensation, dismissing the plaintiff's claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts