The SHO of Padubidri Police Station vs Mohamad Shafeeq — 893/2024
Case under Essential Commodities Act Section 3,7. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 07th May 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAUP020019952024
Next Hearing
07th May 2026
e-Filing Number
03-03-2023
Filing Number
893/2024
Filing Date
05-06-2024
Registration No
893/2024
Registration Date
05-06-2024
Court
PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM COURT, UDUPI
Judge
602-I Addl Sr Civil Judge and ACJM Udupi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The SHO (Station House Officer) of Padubidri Police Station
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Mohamad Shafeeq
Hearing History
Judge: 602-I Addl Sr Civil Judge and ACJM Udupi
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 05-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 18-12-2025 | EVIDENCE |
| 30-10-2025 | EVIDENCE |
| 11-09-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary This is a witness examination transcript (recorded 06-03-2026) from the Additional Senior Civil Judge and ACJ(M) Court, Udupi, in case CC:893/2024. The witness (retired ASI Jagannath R. Salian, 62 years) testified regarding a seizure of rice allegedly meant for the Public Distribution System on 20-09-2022. During extensive cross-examination, the defense counsel challenged multiple aspects of the witness's testimony, including inconsistencies in procedural compliance, lack of proper documentation, absence of sample collection for verification, and questionable chain-of-custody procedures. The court recorded the witness's responses to detailed questions about the seizure operation, investigation methodology, and evidentiary protocols. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary This is a witness examination transcript (recorded 06-03-2026) from the Additional Senior Civil Judge and ACJ(M) Court, Udupi, in case CC:893/2024. The witness (retired ASI Jagannath R. Salian, 62 years) testified regarding a seizure of rice allegedly meant for the Public Distribution System on 20-09-2022. During extensive cross-examination, the defense counsel challenged multiple aspects of the witness's testimony, including inconsistencies in procedural compliance, lack of proper documentation, absence of sample collection for verification, and questionable chain-of-custody procedures. The court recorded the witness's responses to detailed questions about the seizure operation, investigation methodology, and evidentiary protocols. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts