Subrahmanya vs Safwan — 388/2025

Case under Indian Motor Vehicle Act 1988 Section U/s166. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 18th March 2026.

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KAUP020019062025

EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

18th March 2026

Filing Number

170/2025

Filing Date

13-05-2025

Registration No

388/2025

Registration Date

10-06-2025

Court

PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM COURT, UDUPI

Judge

508-PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM UDUPI

Acts & Sections

Indian Motor Vehicle Act 1988 Section U/s166

Petitioner(s)

Subrahmanya

Adv. Poornima K.

Respondent(s)

Safwan

The United India Ins.Co.Ltd.,Udupi, Rep.by its Nearest Branch Div. Manager

Hearing History

Judge: 508-PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM UDUPI

06-03-2026

EVIDENCE

10-02-2026

EVIDENCE

20-01-2026

EVIDENCE

29-12-2025

EVIDENCE

20-12-2025

EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

05-12-2025
Deposition
29-12-2025
Deposition
10-02-2026
Deposition

Case Summary Case No.: M.V.C 388/2025 | Date: 10-02-2026 Outcome: The court examined witness testimony and documentary evidence (Case Sheet marked as Exhibit 17, with signatures on Exhibits 12 and 13 marked as 12(M) and 13(M)). The respondent's counsel cross-examined the petitioner, challenging claims regarding medical certificates, treatment, and disability assessment. The witness testimony was recorded and the court found the evidence satisfactory. The case proceedings were completed with witness examination concluded as per court procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case No.: M.V.C 388/2025 | Date: 10-02-2026 Outcome: The court examined witness testimony and documentary evidence (Case Sheet marked as Exhibit 17, with signatures on Exhibits 12 and 13 marked as 12(M) and 13(M)). The respondent's counsel cross-examined the petitioner, challenging claims regarding medical certificates, treatment, and disability assessment. The witness testimony was recorded and the court found the evidence satisfactory. The case proceedings were completed with witness examination concluded as per court procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM COURT, UDUPI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case