SHO, Padubidri P.S. vs Sandeep Kulal — 742/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section U/S 385. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 12th March 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAUP020016382024
Next Hearing
12th March 2026
Filing Number
742/2024
Filing Date
28-05-2024
Registration No
742/2024
Registration Date
28-05-2024
Court
PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM COURT, UDUPI
Judge
602-I Addl Sr Civil Judge and ACJM Udupi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHO (Station House Officer), Padubidri P.S.
Adv. Asst. Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
Sandeep Kulal
Esha @ Esha Kumar
Breshan D-souza
Bhagavan Das
Shailesh Bangera
Vijayendra
Guru
Anil Kumar
Ramesh
Harish
Hearing History
Judge: 602-I Addl Sr Civil Judge and ACJM Udupi
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 24-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 18-12-2025 | EVIDENCE |
| 15-11-2025 | EVIDENCE |
| 16-10-2025 | APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a Kannada language court order (Case No. CC:742/2024) from the Additional Senior Civil Judge and ACJMs Court, Udupi, dated March 6, 2026. The court examined witness Jayaram regarding an extortion case involving allegations that the accused obtained 7 lakhs rupees from the complainant by threatening to defame him. The court found the witness testimony to be unreliable and contradictory, noting inconsistencies in the witness's account of events from 2014 and determining that the witness was providing false evidence to assist the accused. The court declined to grant credibility to the witness's testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a Kannada language court order (Case No. CC:742/2024) from the Additional Senior Civil Judge and ACJMs Court, Udupi, dated March 6, 2026. The court examined witness Jayaram regarding an extortion case involving allegations that the accused obtained 7 lakhs rupees from the complainant by threatening to defame him. The court found the witness testimony to be unreliable and contradictory, noting inconsistencies in the witness's account of events from 2014 and determining that the witness was providing false evidence to assist the accused. The court declined to grant credibility to the witness's testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts