Gudme Usman-Rep. by Guardian Son Salahuddin vs Steven Nazareth Advocate - Clinton Dsilva — 527/2022

Case under Indian Motor Vehicle Act 1988 Section 166. Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 12th March 2026.

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KAUP020015422022

ARGUMENTS

Next Hearing

12th March 2026

Filing Number

527/2022

Filing Date

01-07-2022

Registration No

527/2022

Registration Date

15-07-2022

Court

PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM COURT, UDUPI

Judge

602-I Addl Sr Civil Judge and ACJM Udupi

Acts & Sections

Indian Motor Vehicle Act 1988 Section 166

Petitioner(s)

Gudme Usman-Rep. by Guardian Son Salahuddin

Adv. SANKAPPA A.

Respondent(s)

Steven Nazareth Advocate - Clinton Dsilva

The Divisional Manager, New India Ass.Co.Ltd., udupi

Adv. ANANDA MADIVALA .

Totappa Murigeppa Mekki

Hearing History

Judge: 602-I Addl Sr Civil Judge and ACJM Udupi

06-03-2026

ARGUMENTS

02-03-2026

ARGUMENTS

25-02-2026

ARGUMENTS

20-02-2026

ARGUMENTS

16-02-2026

ARGUMENTS

Interim Orders

06-07-2023
Orders
18-11-2023
Orders
27-01-2024
Issue
20-02-2024
Deposition
04-06-2024
Issue
03-07-2024
Deposition
01-08-2024
Deposition
26-12-2024
Deposition
09-06-2025
Deposition
19-11-2025
Deposition
20-01-2026
Deposition
10-02-2026
Deposition

Summary In M.V.C. 527/2022, the court proceedings were held on 10-02-2026 where witness testimony was recorded. The court found that the petitioner's injury was caused by wounds and not by any other reason, and rejected the petitioner's false evidence claim regarding compensation to the family. The court's cross-examination was completed and the matter was disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In M.V.C. 527/2022, the court proceedings were held on 10-02-2026 where witness testimony was recorded. The court found that the petitioner's injury was caused by wounds and not by any other reason, and rejected the petitioner's false evidence claim regarding compensation to the family. The court's cross-examination was completed and the matter was disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM COURT, UDUPI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case