Shankara Poojary vs Krishna Poojary Advocate - UMESH K SHETTY — 103/2017
Case under Civil Procedure Code 1908 Section SEC26OVIIR1. Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 26th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAUP020014082017
Next Hearing
26th March 2026
Filing Number
105/2017
Filing Date
02-11-2017
Registration No
103/2017
Registration Date
13-11-2017
Court
PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM COURT, UDUPI
Judge
508-PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM UDUPI
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shankara Poojary
Adv. BALACHANDRA K RAO
Respondent(s)
Krishna Poojary Advocate - UMESH K SHETTY
Janaki Poojarthi
Adv. UMESH K SHETTY
Pavithra Poojary
Rama Poojary
Adv. UMESH K SHETTY
Vasantha Poojary
Jayantha Poojary
Adv. UMESH K SHETTY
Jayashree Poojary
Adv. UMESH K SHETTY
Harish Poojary
Ashok Poojary
Adv. UMESH K SHETTY
Yogeesh Poojary
Adv. UMESH K SHETTY
Vittala Poojary
Raghu Poojary
Shantha Poojarthi
Sharada Poojarthi
Harishchandra Poojary
Shobha Poojarthi
Prema Poojarthi
Latha Poojarthi
Harish Kumar
Suma
Girish Poojary
Raju Poojary
Adv. Anil Kumar
Bhoju Poojary
Bukki Poojarthi
Adv. Anil Kumar
Hari Narayana Tantri
Adv. Vittal A. Bhat
Udaya Poojary
Adv. UMESH K SHETTY
Gopal Naika
Shubha Satyanarayana
Aishwarya D. Poojary
S. R. Indira
Hearing History
Judge: 508-PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM UDUPI
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 11-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 21-01-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 05-01-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 19-12-2025 | ARGUMENTS |
Interim Orders
Summary In O.S. 103/2017, on 14-11-2025, the court recorded the witness's examination-in-chief. The defendants and their counsel were absent, so no cross-examination objection was noted. The plaintiff's counsel had already cross-examined the witness in open court, and the court accepted the evidence on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In O.S. 103/2017, on 14-11-2025, the court recorded the witness's examination-in-chief. The defendants and their counsel were absent, so no cross-examination objection was noted. The plaintiff's counsel had already cross-examined the witness in open court, and the court accepted the evidence on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts