The SHO Manipal P.S vs GIRIRAJ PALAN — 55/2021

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 427,506,341,34,365,323,324,342. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 13th March 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAUP020011062021

EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

13th March 2026

e-Filing Number

11-11-2021

Filing Number

55/2021

Filing Date

11-11-2021

Registration No

55/2021

Registration Date

11-11-2021

Court

PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM COURT, UDUPI

Judge

602-I Addl Sr Civil Judge and ACJM Udupi

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 427,506,341,34,365,323,324,342

Petitioner(s)

The SHO (Station House Officer) Manipal P.S

Adv. State by Sr. APP

Respondent(s)

GIRIRAJ PALAN

JOSEPH ROMIO DANTHE

GURUPRASAD @ HARI

Hearing History

Judge: 602-I Addl Sr Civil Judge and ACJM Udupi

06-03-2026

EVIDENCE

26-02-2026

EVIDENCE

23-01-2026

EVIDENCE

27-11-2025

EVIDENCE

25-09-2025

EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

04-08-2023
Charge
23-01-2026
Deposition
23-01-2026
Deposition
06-03-2026
Deposition
06-03-2026
Deposition
06-03-2026
Deposition
06-03-2026
Deposition

The witness (Farooq, age 43, laborer from Kootapadi) testified in Civil Case CC:55/2021 before the Additional Senior Civil Judge and ACJMs Court in Udupi on 06-03-2026. During cross-examination by the Senior Assistant Government Prosecutor, the witness's testimony regarding an alleged incident on 06-07-2021 involving vehicles and assault was challenged, and the witness's statement given to police on 08-07-2021 was marked as Exhibit 8 and rejected. The court found contradictions in the witness's account regarding whether he provided a statement to police and the circumstances of the incident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The witness (Farooq, age 43, laborer from Kootapadi) testified in Civil Case CC:55/2021 before the Additional Senior Civil Judge and ACJMs Court in Udupi on 06-03-2026. During cross-examination by the Senior Assistant Government Prosecutor, the witness's testimony regarding an alleged incident on 06-07-2021 involving vehicles and assault was challenged, and the witness's statement given to police on 08-07-2021 was marked as Exhibit 8 and rejected. The court found contradictions in the witness's account regarding whether he provided a statement to police and the circumstances of the incident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM COURT, UDUPI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case