Rathna J Rai alias Rathni vs Koraga Poojary alias Koragasppa Suvarna — 49/2024

Case under Civil Procedure Code 1908 Section U/S.26,O.VII,R1. Status: Notice. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.

Notice Next hearing 16-Apr-2026 this date has passed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAUP020007682024

Filing Number

54/2024

Filing Date

10-Mar-2022

Registration No

49/2024

Registration Date

21-Mar-2024

Court

PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM COURT, UDUPI

Judge

508-Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi

Last updated 12-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Civil Procedure Code 1908 Section U/S.26,O.VII,R1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rathna J Rai alias Rathni

    Adv. Harish M.M.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Koraga Poojary alias Koragasppa Suvarna

  2. 2.Vijaya K Suvarna

    Adv. Nagaraja Rao

  3. 3.Gulabi

  4. 4.Kamala

  5. 5.Rathni

Case History

  1. 16-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Notice

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi

  3. 19-Feb-2026

    Notice

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi

  4. 29-Jan-2026

    Notice

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi

  5. 08-Dec-2025

    Notice

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi

  6. 07-Nov-2025

    Notice

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi

  7. 17-Oct-2025

    Notice

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi

  8. 20-Sep-2025

    Notice

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi

  9. 06-Aug-2025

    Notice

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi

  10. 04-Jul-2025

    Objections

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi

  11. 11-Jun-2025

    Objections

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi

  12. 02-May-2025

    Objections

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi

  13. 08-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi

  14. 03-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi

  15. 01-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi

  16. 28-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi

  17. 06-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi

  18. 10-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi

  19. 04-Dec-2024

    DepositionView PDF

    Summary In OS (Original Suit) No. 49/2024 before the Principal District Civil Court, Udupi, the court examined witness testimony on 04-12-2024 regarding a land dispute. The witness (first defendant's counsel) disputed claims about property possession, challenging assertions regarding a scheduled property allegedly held by Ram Billava since 1967 and subsequently by the first defendant. The court recorded the witness's examination and cross-examination statements challenging the plaintiff's claims on grounds including lapse of time (25 years) and limitations of claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  20. 04-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi

  21. 14-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi

  22. 30-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi

  23. 13-Sep-2024

    DepositionView PDF

  24. 13-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi

  25. 05-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi

  26. 05-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi

  27. 08-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi

  28. 07-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi

  29. 22-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM Udupi

  30. 26-Mar-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  31. 10-Mar-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 49/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In OS (Original Suit) No. 49/2024 before the Principal District Civil Court, Udupi, the court examined witness testimony on 04-12-2024 regarding a land dispute. The witness (first defendant's counsel) disputed claims about property possession, challenging assertions regarding a scheduled property allegedly held by Ram Billava since 1967 and subsequently by the first defendant. The court recorded the witness's examination and cross-examination statements challenging the plaintiff's claims on grounds including lapse of time (25 years) and limitations of claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case