Rathna J Rai alias Rathni vs Koraga Poojary alias Koragasppa Suvarna — 49/2024

Case under Civil Procedure Code 1908 Section U/S.26,O.VII,R1. Status: NOTICE. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAUP020007682024

NOTICE

Next Hearing

16th April 2026

Filing Number

54/2024

Filing Date

10-03-2022

Registration No

49/2024

Registration Date

21-03-2024

Court

PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM COURT, UDUPI

Judge

508-PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM UDUPI

Acts & Sections

Civil Procedure Code 1908 Section U/S.26,O.VII,R1

Petitioner(s)

Rathna J Rai alias Rathni

Adv. Harish M.M.

Respondent(s)

Koraga Poojary alias Koragasppa Suvarna

Vijaya K Suvarna

Adv. Nagaraja Rao

Gulabi

Kamala

Rathni

Hearing History

Judge: 508-PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM UDUPI

06-03-2026

NOTICE

19-02-2026

NOTICE

29-01-2026

NOTICE

08-12-2025

NOTICE

07-11-2025

NOTICE

Interim Orders

13-09-2024
Deposition
04-12-2024
Deposition

Summary In OS (Original Suit) No. 49/2024 before the Principal District Civil Court, Udupi, the court examined witness testimony on 04-12-2024 regarding a land dispute. The witness (first defendant's counsel) disputed claims about property possession, challenging assertions regarding a scheduled property allegedly held by Ram Billava since 1967 and subsequently by the first defendant. The court recorded the witness's examination and cross-examination statements challenging the plaintiff's claims on grounds including lapse of time (25 years) and limitations of claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In OS (Original Suit) No. 49/2024 before the Principal District Civil Court, Udupi, the court examined witness testimony on 04-12-2024 regarding a land dispute. The witness (first defendant's counsel) disputed claims about property possession, challenging assertions regarding a scheduled property allegedly held by Ram Billava since 1967 and subsequently by the first defendant. The court recorded the witness's examination and cross-examination statements challenging the plaintiff's claims on grounds including lapse of time (25 years) and limitations of claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM COURT, UDUPI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case