G. Raju Poojary vs Laxmana Poojary — 3/2023
Case under Civil Procedure Code 1908 Section U/S.54,OR.XX,RU.12,18. Status: STEPS. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.
F.D.P - Petitioner For Final Decree pr
CNR: KAUP020006372023
Next Hearing
28th April 2026
Filing Number
8/2023
Filing Date
07-02-2023
Registration No
3/2023
Registration Date
07-02-2023
Court
PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM COURT, UDUPI
Judge
602-I Addl Sr Civil Judge and ACJM Udupi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
G. Raju Poojary
Adv. A. PRITHVIRAJ HEGDE
Baby Poojarthi, Rep by G.P.A.H. G. Raju Poojary
Vanaja Poojarthi, Rep by G.P.A.H. G. Raju Poojary
Respondent(s)
Laxmana Poojary
Hearing History
Judge: 602-I Addl Sr Civil Judge and ACJM Udupi
STEPS
ORDERS
ORDERS
STEPS
ORDERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | STEPS |
| 27-02-2026 | ORDERS |
| 20-02-2026 | ORDERS |
| 07-01-2026 | STEPS |
| 18-12-2025 | ORDERS |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary The court allowed I.A.No.II and I.A.No.III under the Partition Act. I.A.No.II was allowed permitting petitioners and respondent to sell the 3-cent property (small tiled house) instead of dividing it, since physical division would result in unviable shares of less than 1 cent each, with sale proceeds distributed according to their 1/4th share entitlements. I.A.No.III was also allowed, granting co-sharers (including Petitioner No.1) the right to purchase the property at the highest bid rate, prioritizing their interest over third parties before auction sale. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary The court allowed I.A.No.II and I.A.No.III under the Partition Act. I.A.No.II was allowed permitting petitioners and respondent to sell the 3-cent property (small tiled house) instead of dividing it, since physical division would result in unviable shares of less than 1 cent each, with sale proceeds distributed according to their 1/4th share entitlements. I.A.No.III was also allowed, granting co-sharers (including Petitioner No.1) the right to purchase the property at the highest bid rate, prioritizing their interest over third parties before auction sale. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts