K. Leelavathi vs Vijay Pratap Shetty Advocate - VISHNUMOORTHY S. UDUPA — 56/2021
Case under Civil Procedure Code 1908 Section U/s26OVIIR1. Status: AWAIT REPORT. Next hearing: 25th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAUP020005412021
Next Hearing
25th April 2026
Filing Number
56/2021
Filing Date
07-06-2021
Registration No
56/2021
Registration Date
08-06-2021
Court
PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM COURT, UDUPI
Judge
602-I Addl Sr Civil Judge and ACJM Udupi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
K. Leelavathi
Adv. SMT. VANI V. RAO
Anantha Padmanabha PH
Adv. SMT. VANI V. RAO
Srinivasa P
Adv. SMT. VANI V. RAO
Respondent(s)
Vijay Pratap Shetty Advocate - VISHNUMOORTHY S. UDUPA
V Pratap Shetty
Adv. VISHNUMOORTHY S. UDUPA
Hearing History
Judge: 602-I Addl Sr Civil Judge and ACJM Udupi
AWAIT REPORT
ORDERS
ORDERS
ORDERS
ORDERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | AWAIT REPORT |
| 26-02-2026 | ORDERS |
| 09-02-2026 | ORDERS |
| 28-01-2026 | ORDERS |
| 21-01-2026 | ORDERS |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: O.S.-56/2021, P.W.-01 | Court: High Court, Udupi | Date: 16-06-2025 Outcome: The case was adjourned for continuation of main hearing. The court admitted multiple unregistered lease agreements (dated 1989-2001) as exhibits with conditional admissibility—marking them for identification, but reserving final admissibility pending verification and payment of deficit stamp duty and penalties applicable on their execution dates. Witness testimony was recorded and further adjournment was granted to the plaintiff's counsel for main hearing continuation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: O.S.-56/2021, P.W.-01 | Court: High Court, Udupi | Date: 16-06-2025 Outcome: The case was adjourned for continuation of main hearing. The court admitted multiple unregistered lease agreements (dated 1989-2001) as exhibits with conditional admissibility—marking them for identification, but reserving final admissibility pending verification and payment of deficit stamp duty and penalties applicable on their execution dates. Witness testimony was recorded and further adjournment was granted to the plaintiff's counsel for main hearing continuation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts