Ramachandra H. Shetty vs Shantha — 53/2016
Case under Civil Procedure Code 1908 Section 26. Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 25th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAUP020004762016
Next Hearing
25th March 2026
Filing Number
54/2016
Filing Date
18-06-2016
Registration No
53/2016
Registration Date
18-06-2016
Court
PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM COURT, UDUPI
Judge
508-PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM UDUPI
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ramachandra H. Shetty
Adv. GANGADHAR ACHARYA H.M
Respondent(s)
Shantha
Udaya Poojary
Adv. DEVARAJA SHETTIGAR
Hearing History
Judge: 508-PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM UDUPI
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 11-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 21-01-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 06-01-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 17-12-2025 | ARGUMENTS |
Interim Orders
Summary The court dismissed both interim applications (IA No. 22 and 23) filed by the plaintiff in a specific performance of contract suit. IA No. 22 sought to recall the 2nd defendant for further cross-examination based on recently traced documents, while IA No. 23 sought to reopen the case. The court found the plaintiff's applications to be vague, lacking specificity about documents, and tainted with mala fides given the pattern of multiple rejected applications filed after case posting for arguments. The matter was scheduled for final arguments by 07.03.2020. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court dismissed both interim applications (IA No. 22 and 23) filed by the plaintiff in a specific performance of contract suit. IA No. 22 sought to recall the 2nd defendant for further cross-examination based on recently traced documents, while IA No. 23 sought to reopen the case. The court found the plaintiff's applications to be vague, lacking specificity about documents, and tainted with mala fides given the pattern of multiple rejected applications filed after case posting for arguments. The matter was scheduled for final arguments by 07.03.2020. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts