555 Fisheries Malpe, Udupi, Rep by Managing Partner, Sanjay Karkera vs Mohammed Junaid — 21/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 2(1)(h),223. Disposed: Uncontested--REGISTERED AS CC on 06th March 2026.

PCR - PRIVATE COMPLAINTS

CNR: KAUP020000682025

Case disposed

Filing Number

20/2025

Filing Date

17-01-2025

Registration No

21/2025

Registration Date

17-01-2025

Court

PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM COURT, UDUPI

Judge

508-PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM UDUPI

Decision Date

06th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--REGISTERED AS CC

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 2(1)(h),223
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

555 Fisheries Malpe, Udupi, Rep by Managing Partner, Sanjay Karkera

Adv. H.RAGHAVENDRA SHETTY

Respondent(s)

Mohammed Junaid

Hearing History

Judge: 508-PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM UDUPI

06-03-2026

Disposed

10-02-2026

EVIDENCE

07-02-2026

ORDERS

08-01-2026

HEARING

04-12-2025

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

06-03-2026
Deposition
06-03-2026
Orders

Summary The court took cognizance of a cheque bounce complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, finding prima facie evidence against the accused. The court held that the NI Act being a special statute prescribes its own procedure (Section 142), making CrPC/BNSS inapplicable, and therefore no notice to the accused before cognizance was required. The court registered the criminal case and directed issuance of summons to the accused through police and registered post. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

10-02-2026
Orders
casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court took cognizance of a cheque bounce complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, finding prima facie evidence against the accused. The court held that the NI Act being a special statute prescribes its own procedure (Section 142), making CrPC/BNSS inapplicable, and therefore no notice to the accused before cognizance was required. The court registered the criminal case and directed issuance of summons to the accused through police and registered post. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM COURT, UDUPI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case