555 Fisheries, Malpe, Rep. by Managing Partner Sanjay Karkera vs Mohammed Junaid — 20/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 2(1)(h),223. Disposed: Uncontested--REGISTERED AS CC on 06th March 2026.
PCR - PRIVATE COMPLAINTS
CNR: KAUP020000672025
Filing Number
19/2025
Filing Date
17-01-2025
Registration No
20/2025
Registration Date
17-01-2025
Court
PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM COURT, UDUPI
Judge
508-PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM UDUPI
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--REGISTERED AS CC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
555 Fisheries, Malpe, Rep. by Managing Partner Sanjay Karkera
Adv. H.RAGHAVENDRA SHETTY
Respondent(s)
Mohammed Junaid
Hearing History
Judge: 508-PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM UDUPI
Disposed
EVIDENCE
ORDERS
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 07-02-2026 | ORDERS |
| 08-01-2026 | HEARING |
| 04-12-2025 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court took cognizance of an offense under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act based on prima facie evidence (cheque, endorsement, notice, and postal acknowledgment) without issuing notice to the accused. The court held that the NI Act, being a special statute, prescribes its own procedure under Section 142, which overrides the Code of Criminal Procedure/BNSS provisions. The court subsequently directed registration of a criminal case and issuance of summons to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The court took cognizance of an offense under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act based on prima facie evidence (cheque, endorsement, notice, and postal acknowledgment) without issuing notice to the accused. The court held that the NI Act, being a special statute, prescribes its own procedure under Section 142, which overrides the Code of Criminal Procedure/BNSS provisions. The court subsequently directed registration of a criminal case and issuance of summons to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts