Shailaja Suresh Jathan vs The State, By Malpe P.S, Rep.by PP, Udupi — 70/2024
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section U/s397,r/w399. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 06th March 2026.
Crl.R.P. - CRIMINAL REVISION PETITIONS
CNR: KAUP010022052024
e-Filing Number
22-10-2024
Filing Number
71/2024
Filing Date
22-10-2024
Registration No
70/2024
Registration Date
23-10-2024
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, UDUPI
Judge
1440-II Addl District and Sessions Judge Udupi
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shailaja Suresh Jathan
Adv. SHANTHARAM M SHETTY
Respondent(s)
The State, By Malpe P.S, Rep.by PP (Public Prosecutor), Udupi
Hearing History
Judge: 1440-II Addl District and Sessions Judge Udupi
Disposed
ORDERS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-02-2026 | ORDERS |
| 22-01-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 17-12-2025 | ARGUMENTS |
| 28-11-2025 | ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The II Additional District & Sessions Judge, Udupi, allowed the revision petition and set aside the trial court's order accepting the police's 'B' report (closure report) in a burglary case. The court found that the trial court violated natural justice principles by accepting the 'B' report without issuing a fresh notice to the complainant after the case was transferred between courts, denying her opportunity to file objections. The court directed the complainant to appear on 06.04.2026 to file a protest petition within 15 days, allowing her to present her case before the trial court reconsiders the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The II Additional District & Sessions Judge, Udupi, allowed the revision petition and set aside the trial court's order accepting the police's 'B' report (closure report) in a burglary case. The court found that the trial court violated natural justice principles by accepting the 'B' report without issuing a fresh notice to the complainant after the case was transferred between courts, denying her opportunity to file objections. The court directed the complainant to appear on 06.04.2026 to file a protest petition within 15 days, allowing her to present her case before the trial court reconsiders the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts