The State Rep by Dy.S.P Karkala Sub Division, Udupi vs Preetham Advocate - SANJEEVA A . — 58/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section U/Sec.341, 504, 323, 324, 506 r/w 34. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 18th March 2026.
Spl.C - SPECIAL CASES
CNR: KAUP010016342023
Next Hearing
18th March 2026
e-Filing Number
22-08-2023
Filing Number
58/2023
Filing Date
22-08-2023
Registration No
58/2023
Registration Date
22-08-2023
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, UDUPI
Judge
507-Prl District and Sessions Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State Rep by Dy.S.P Karkala Sub Division, Udupi
Respondent(s)
Preetham Advocate - SANJEEVA A .
Ashoka
Adv. SANJEEVA A .
Sukesha
Adv. SANJEEVA A .
Hearing History
Judge: 507-Prl District and Sessions Judge
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
FRAMING OF CHARGE OR PLEA
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 05-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 09-12-2025 | EVIDENCE |
| 29-10-2025 | EVIDENCE |
| 28-10-2025 | FRAMING OF CHARGE OR PLEA |
Interim Orders
Summary: In Special Case No. 58/2023 before the Principal District and Sessions Court, Udupi, a witness (Rayesh, age 49, farmer) testified on 06-03-2026 regarding an alleged assault on accused persons 1, 4, and 5. The witness denied knowledge of the accused and the incident, stating he was questioned by police about 2 years prior without understanding why his signature was obtained on documents (marked as P-1 and P-6) and photographs (P-3). The court allowed the witness to be treated as a hostile witness for cross-examination by the prosecution. The case proceeded with examination of evidence regarding alleged assault charges and documentary exhibits dated 20-06-2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Deposition
Summary: In Special Case No. 58/2023 before the Principal District and Sessions Court, Udupi, a witness (Rayesh, age 49, farmer) testified on 06-03-2026 regarding an alleged assault on accused persons 1, 4, and 5. The witness denied knowledge of the accused and the incident, stating he was questioned by police about 2 years prior without understanding why his signature was obtained on documents (marked as P-1 and P-6) and photographs (P-3). The court allowed the witness to be treated as a hostile witness for cross-examination by the prosecution. The case proceeded with examination of evidence regarding alleged assault charges and documentary exhibits dated 20-06-2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts