The state Rep. by PSI, Udupi CEN Police Station vs Bhavan Shankar Advocate - AROOR SUKESH SHETTY — 47/2023
Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 8(c),20(b)(ii)B,27(b). Status: Framing Of Charge Or Plea. Next hearing: 28th March 2026.
Spl.C - SPECIAL CASES
CNR: KAUP010013952023
Filing Number
47/2023
Filing Date
21-Jul-2023
Registration No
47/2023
Registration Date
21-Jul-2023
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, UDUPI
Judge
507-Prl District and Sessions Judge
Last updated 12-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The state Rep. by PSI, Udupi CEN Police Station
Adv. P.P. Udupi.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Bhavan Shankar Advocate - AROOR SUKESH SHETTY
-
2.Nithesh
Adv. Clinton Dsilva
Case History
-
28-Mar-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Jan-2026
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Dec-2025
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Aug-2025
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
22-Apr-2025
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Feb-2025
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
28-Nov-2024
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
01-Oct-2024
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Jul-2024
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
27-Jun-2024
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
27-May-2024
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
30-Mar-2024
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
15-Feb-2024
OrdersView PDF
CASE SUMMARY Bail Granted. Accused No.2 (Nithish) was charged under NDPS Act sections 8(c) and 20(b)(ii)(B) for alleged drug trafficking and granted regular bail on a personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with two sureties of equal amount. The court found that since investigation was concluded and the charge sheet filed, continued detention served no purpose, and the accused's permanent residence, family responsibilities, and undertaking to comply with bail conditions made the risk of absconding remote. Stringent conditions were imposed including mandatory court attendance, prohibition on evidence tampering/witness intimidation, and cooperation with the investigating officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Feb-2024
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
08-Feb-2024
Orders
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
07-Feb-2024
Bail
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
05-Feb-2024
Bail
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
03-Feb-2024
Appearance Of Accussed
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
29-Nov-2023
Appearance Of Accussed
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
26-Sep-2023
Appearance Of Accussed
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Jul-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Jul-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 47/2023
CASE SUMMARY Bail Granted. Accused No.2 (Nithish) was charged under NDPS Act sections 8(c) and 20(b)(ii)(B) for alleged drug trafficking and granted regular bail on a personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with two sureties of equal amount. The court found that since investigation was concluded and the charge sheet filed, continued detention served no purpose, and the accused's permanent residence, family responsibilities, and undertaking to comply with bail conditions made the risk of absconding remote. Stringent conditions were imposed including mandatory court attendance, prohibition on evidence tampering/witness intimidation, and cooperation with the investigating officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts