The PS.I., Udupi Town P.S., Udupi vs Shabeer Advocate - MOHAMMED IQBAL — 31/2015
Case under Indian Penal Code Section U/s307r/w34. Status: JUDGEMENT. Next hearing: 28th March 2026.
SC - SESSION CASES
CNR: KAUP010012742015
Next Hearing
28th March 2026
Filing Date
18-08-2015
Registration No
31/2015
Registration Date
18-08-2015
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, UDUPI
Judge
1440-II Addl District and Sessions Judge Udupi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The PS.I., Udupi Town P.S., Udupi
Adv. P.P.Udupi.
Respondent(s)
Shabeer Advocate - MOHAMMED IQBAL
Habeeb
Irshad
Rizwan
Hearing History
Judge: 1440-II Addl District and Sessions Judge Udupi
JUDGEMENT
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
STATEMENT U/S. 313 OF CR.P.C
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 27-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 25-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 19-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 04-02-2026 | STATEMENT U/S. 313 OF CR.P.C |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: This is a Session Case No. 31/2015 from the Second Additional District and Sessions Court in Udipi involving four accused persons (Shabeer, Habib, Irshad, and Rizwan). The court examined the accused under Section 313 of the CrPC on 19.02.2026, posing 19 questions relating to witness testimonies regarding an alleged incident of illegal transportation of livestock using a stolen Esteem car (KA-19-EN-8448) on the night of 27-05-2014. The document records the accused's responses to these examination questions, but the actual answers provided by the accused are left blank in the record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: This is a Session Case No. 31/2015 from the Second Additional District and Sessions Court in Udipi involving four accused persons (Shabeer, Habib, Irshad, and Rizwan). The court examined the accused under Section 313 of the CrPC on 19.02.2026, posing 19 questions relating to witness testimonies regarding an alleged incident of illegal transportation of livestock using a stolen Esteem car (KA-19-EN-8448) on the night of 27-05-2014. The document records the accused's responses to these examination questions, but the actual answers provided by the accused are left blank in the record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts