Shivaram Mogaveera vs M/S.Swastika CoCo Product Pvt.,Ltd, Katbelthuru Kundapura — 2/2022
Case under Industrial Disputes Act Section 10(1)(C). Status: HEARING. Next hearing: 24th March 2026.
Ref.10.1.C.OF ID ACT
CNR: KAUP010010692022
Next Hearing
24th March 2026
Filing Number
2/2022
Filing Date
14-06-2022
Registration No
2/2022
Registration Date
14-06-2022
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, UDUPI
Judge
507-Prl District and Sessions Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shivaram Mogaveera
Adv. DINESH B.SHETTY
Vijaya
Adv. DINESH B.SHETTY
Devaraj Poojary
Adv. DINESH B.SHETTY
Bhaskar Poojary
Adv. DINESH B.SHETTY
Shantha
Adv. DINESH B.SHETTY
Nagratna Devadiga
Adv. DINESH B.SHETTY
Kiran Mesta
Adv. DINESH B.SHETTY
Shantabala Rodrigues
Adv. DINESH B.SHETTY
Respondent(s)
M/S.Swastika CoCo Product Pvt.,Ltd, Katbelthuru Kundapura
Hearing History
Judge: 507-Prl District and Sessions Judge
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 20-02-2026 | HEARING |
| 05-02-2026 | HEARING |
| 28-01-2026 | HEARING |
| 12-01-2026 | HEARING |
Interim Orders
Summary This is an Industrial Dispute (I.D 2/2022) order from the District and Sessions Court, Udupi, dated 16-04-2024. The court allowed the petitioner's claim, finding that the petitioner was a permanent employee of the 2nd respondent establishment and is entitled to gratuity, provident fund contributions, three months' wages, ESI benefits, and other statutory dues upon the establishment's closure on 09-07-2019. The court held that the 2nd respondent failed to provide proper notice, maintain attendance records, or pay statutory benefits as required by law, and directed payment of all outstanding dues owed to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is an Industrial Dispute (I.D 2/2022) order from the District and Sessions Court, Udupi, dated 16-04-2024. The court allowed the petitioner's claim, finding that the petitioner was a permanent employee of the 2nd respondent establishment and is entitled to gratuity, provident fund contributions, three months' wages, ESI benefits, and other statutory dues upon the establishment's closure on 09-07-2019. The court held that the 2nd respondent failed to provide proper notice, maintain attendance records, or pay statutory benefits as required by law, and directed payment of all outstanding dues owed to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts