Vishwanath Shetty vs Sudhakara Sadashiva Shetty Advocate - MAHAMMAD SUHAN — 61/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/Sec.26,OrVII,R1. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 17th March 2026.
Com.O.S. - COM. ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KAUP010005392023
Next Hearing
17th March 2026
Filing Number
58/2023
Filing Date
15-03-2023
Registration No
61/2023
Registration Date
23-03-2023
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, UDUPI
Judge
507-Prl District and Sessions Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vishwanath Shetty
Adv. DEVARAJA SHETTIGAR
Respondent(s)
Sudhakara Sadashiva Shetty Advocate - MAHAMMAD SUHAN
Hearing History
Judge: 507-Prl District and Sessions Judge
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 05-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 19-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 13-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a Commercial Court Order (Com.O.S.61/23) from Udupi District Court dated 06-03-2026 in Kannada language. The court examined testimony and evidence in a construction dispute case. The court found that the defendant (D.W. 1) paid only Rs. 25,21,000 to the plaintiff instead of the claimed Rs. 32,50,000, with an additional payment of Rs. 7,50,000 for completion costs, totaling approximately Rs. 32,71,000. The court accepted certain documentary evidence (marked D-2, D-27, P-7) and rejected specific claims in the plaintiff's affidavit regarding payment details and final settlement calculations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a Commercial Court Order (Com.O.S.61/23) from Udupi District Court dated 06-03-2026 in Kannada language. The court examined testimony and evidence in a construction dispute case. The court found that the defendant (D.W. 1) paid only Rs. 25,21,000 to the plaintiff instead of the claimed Rs. 32,50,000, with an additional payment of Rs. 7,50,000 for completion costs, totaling approximately Rs. 32,71,000. The court accepted certain documentary evidence (marked D-2, D-27, P-7) and rejected specific claims in the plaintiff's affidavit regarding payment details and final settlement calculations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts