Srinivasa B.M vs The Competent Authority, NH-17 and Assistant Commissioner, Kundapura Advocate - MARY ANNEY RANJANI SHRESTA — 3/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section R/wORXLI(2),ORXLII,R1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.
M.A. - Miscellanuous Appeals
CNR: KAUP010004672024
Filing Number
3/2024
Filing Date
23-Feb-2024
Registration No
3/2024
Registration Date
01-Mar-2024
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, UDUPI
Judge
507-Prl District and Sessions Judge
Last updated 12-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Srinivasa B.M
Adv. Nagaveni
-
2.Prakash Devadiga
Adv. Nagaveni
-
3.Sadananda Devadiga
Adv. Nagaveni
-
4.Baby Shankara
Adv. Nagaveni
-
5.Shayla Gujaran
Adv. Nagaveni
-
6.Rohini
Adv. Nagaveni
-
7.Lokanath
Adv. Nagaveni
-
8.Mala
Adv. Nagaveni
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Competent Authority, NH-17 and Assistant Commissioner, Kundapura Advocate - MARY ANNEY RANJANI SHRESTA
-
2.Bhoovaraha Hayagriva Devaru, Sri, Sode Mut, Udupi
Adv. VISHNU MOORTHI S. UDUPA
-
3.Sathya Shetty
Adv. DINESH B.SHETTY
Case History
-
08-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Evidence
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
17-Feb-2026
Evidence
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
04-Feb-2026
Evidence
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
21-Jan-2026
Evidence
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
20-Jan-2026
Evidence
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Nov-2025
Evidence
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Oct-2025
Evidence
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Sep-2025
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
23-Sep-2025
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Sep-2025
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
21-Aug-2025
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
07-Aug-2025
Summons
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
21-Jul-2025
Evidence
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
26-Jun-2025
Evidence
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Jun-2025
Evidence
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
08-Apr-2025
Evidence
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
19-Mar-2025
Evidence
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
17-Mar-2025
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
20-Feb-2025
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Jan-2025
Evidence
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Dec-2024
Evidence
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
23-Nov-2024
Evidence
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Oct-2024
Evidence
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
18-Sep-2024
Evidence
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
28-Aug-2024
Evidence
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Jul-2024
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Jul-2024
OrdersView PDF
Summary: I.A.No.III filed by the 2nd respondent seeking permission to file late objections to I.A.No.II was allowed. The court accepted the objections on record, finding that the delay was not deliberate and it was necessary to hear the respondent before condoning the delay to prevent the main petition from being barred by limitation. The case is adjourned to 25.07.2024 for hearing or evidence on I.A.No.II. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Jul-2024
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
08-Jul-2024
Orders
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
05-Jul-2024
Arguments
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
29-Jun-2024
Arguments
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Jun-2024
Arguments
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
01-Jun-2024
Arguments
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
16-Apr-2024
Arguments
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
04-Apr-2024
Arguments
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
20-Mar-2024
Arguments
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
04-Mar-2024
Notice
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
02-Mar-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Feb-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 3/2024
Summary: I.A.No.III filed by the 2nd respondent seeking permission to file late objections to I.A.No.II was allowed. The court accepted the objections on record, finding that the delay was not deliberate and it was necessary to hear the respondent before condoning the delay to prevent the main petition from being barred by limitation. The case is adjourned to 25.07.2024 for hearing or evidence on I.A.No.II. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts