The State Rep. by Dy.S.P., Udupi Sub Division, Udupi District vs Mohammed Althaf Advocate - MOHAMMED IQBAL — 17/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 504,506,323,354(B). Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 08th May 2026.
Spl.C - SPECIAL CASES
CNR: KAUP010003612024
Next Hearing
08th May 2026
e-Filing Number
15-02-2024
Filing Number
17/2024
Filing Date
15-02-2024
Registration No
17/2024
Registration Date
15-02-2024
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, UDUPI
Judge
507-Prl District and Sessions Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State Rep. by Dy.S.P., Udupi Sub Division, Udupi District
Adv. PP Udupi
Respondent(s)
Mohammed Althaf Advocate - MOHAMMED IQBAL
Hearing History
Judge: 507-Prl District and Sessions Judge
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 02-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 26-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 02-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 10-11-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge of Special Court, Udupi, charged Mohammed Althaf (age 57) with offences under IPC Sections 354B (outraging modesty), 504 (insulting language), 506 (criminal intimidation), and Scheduled Caste & Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocity) Act, 1989. The charges stem from an incident on 21.12.2023 where the accused allegedly pulled the saree of a Scheduled Caste woman, abused her with caste-based slurs, and threatened her life while she was feeding stray dogs. The court directed that the accused be tried on these charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge of Special Court, Udupi, charged Mohammed Althaf (age 57) with offences under IPC Sections 354B (outraging modesty), 504 (insulting language), 506 (criminal intimidation), and Scheduled Caste & Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocity) Act, 1989. The charges stem from an incident on 21.12.2023 where the accused allegedly pulled the saree of a Scheduled Caste woman, abused her with caste-based slurs, and threatened her life while she was feeding stray dogs. The court directed that the accused be tried on these charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts