Mohammed Iqbal vs The State, Brahmavara Police Station, Rep by Public Prosecutor, Udupi — 84/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/Sec.482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th March 2026.

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAUP010003202026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

23-02-2026

Filing Number

83/2026

Filing Date

23-02-2026

Registration No

84/2026

Registration Date

23-02-2026

Court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, UDUPI

Judge

507-Prl District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/Sec.482

Petitioner(s)

Mohammed Iqbal

Adv. Nagma Tonse

Respondent(s)

The State, Brahmavara Police Station, Rep by Public Prosecutor, Udupi

Hearing History

Judge: 507-Prl District and Sessions Judge

10-03-2026

Disposed

07-03-2026

ORDERS

06-03-2026

ORDERS

04-03-2026

ORDERS

24-02-2026

BAIL

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
Orders

The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Udupi granted anticipatory bail to Mohammed Iqbal, accused of domestic violence offenses including criminal intimidation and voluntarily causing hurt, holding that the offenses are non-capital and detention would aggravate marital discord. The court imposed stringent conditions including a Rs. 50,000 bail bond, mandatory cooperation with investigation, restrictions on witness tampering, and regular Protection Officer inspections bi-weekly for two months then monthly for three months to safeguard the complainant's security under the Domestic Violence Act, 2005. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Udupi granted anticipatory bail to Mohammed Iqbal, accused of domestic violence offenses including criminal intimidation and voluntarily causing hurt, holding that the offenses are non-capital and detention would aggravate marital discord. The court imposed stringent conditions including a Rs. 50,000 bail bond, mandatory cooperation with investigation, restrictions on witness tampering, and regular Protection Officer inspections bi-weekly for two months then monthly for three months to safeguard the complainant's security under the Domestic Violence Act, 2005. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, UDUPI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case