Bharath Jayarama Das vs The State, Kota P.S, Rep by Public Prosecutor, Udupi — 69/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/Sec.482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 06th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAUP010002822026
Filing Number
68/2026
Filing Date
19-02-2026
Registration No
69/2026
Registration Date
19-02-2026
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, UDUPI
Judge
507-Prl District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bharath Jayarama Das
Adv. AKHIL B. HEGDE
Respondent(s)
The State, Kota P.S, Rep by Public Prosecutor, Udupi
Hearing History
Judge: 507-Prl District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
ORDERS
ORDERS
BAIL
BAIL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 04-03-2026 | ORDERS |
| 26-02-2026 | ORDERS |
| 24-02-2026 | BAIL |
| 20-02-2026 | BAIL |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Udupi granted anticipatory bail to petitioner Bharath Jayarama Das, accused of facilitating online cricket betting through the PARKER777 mobile application. The court found that the petitioner's implication rested primarily on an alleged statement by the co-accused (who was already granted bail), custodial interrogation was not indispensable, and investigation could proceed without arrest. The court imposed five conditions including Rs. 50,000 bail bond, cooperation with investigation, non-tampering with witnesses, abstaining from similar offences, and appearing before the IO within 20 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Udupi granted anticipatory bail to petitioner Bharath Jayarama Das, accused of facilitating online cricket betting through the PARKER777 mobile application. The court found that the petitioner's implication rested primarily on an alleged statement by the co-accused (who was already granted bail), custodial interrogation was not indispensable, and investigation could proceed without arrest. The court imposed five conditions including Rs. 50,000 bail bond, cooperation with investigation, non-tampering with witnesses, abstaining from similar offences, and appearing before the IO within 20 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts