George Anil DSouza vs The State, Udupi RAnge I Excise P.S, Rep by Public Prosecutor, Udupi — 67/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/Sec.482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 06th March 2026.

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAUP010002682026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

18-02-2026

Filing Number

66/2026

Filing Date

18-02-2026

Registration No

67/2026

Registration Date

18-02-2026

Court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, UDUPI

Judge

507-Prl District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

06th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/Sec.482

Petitioner(s)

George Anil DSouza

Adv. ANANDA RAMAKRISHNA.RAO K

Reena Sylvia DSouza

Adv. Sharada N

Respondent(s)

The State, Udupi RAnge I Excise P.S, Rep by Public Prosecutor, Udupi

Hearing History

Judge: 507-Prl District and Sessions Judge

06-03-2026

Disposed

04-03-2026

ORDERS

25-02-2026

ORDERS

19-02-2026

BAIL

Final Orders / Judgements

06-03-2026
Orders

The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Udupi allowed the anticipatory bail petition of George Anil D Souza and Reena Sylvia D Souza, who were accused of illegal liquor transportation under the Karnataka Excise Act. The court found that since the evidence (17 liters of liquor) was already seized, custodial interrogation was unnecessary, and the accused—with no criminal history and local residence—could be secured for trial. The petitioners were granted bail on Rs. 50,000 bond each with conditions including cooperation with investigation, regular trial attendance, and appearance before the investigating officer within 20 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Udupi allowed the anticipatory bail petition of George Anil D Souza and Reena Sylvia D Souza, who were accused of illegal liquor transportation under the Karnataka Excise Act. The court found that since the evidence (17 liters of liquor) was already seized, custodial interrogation was unnecessary, and the accused—with no criminal history and local residence—could be secured for trial. The petitioners were granted bail on Rs. 50,000 bond each with conditions including cooperation with investigation, regular trial attendance, and appearance before the investigating officer within 20 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, UDUPI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case