George Anil DSouza vs The State, Udupi RAnge I Excise P.S, Rep by Public Prosecutor, Udupi — 67/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/Sec.482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 06th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAUP010002682026
e-Filing Number
18-02-2026
Filing Number
66/2026
Filing Date
18-Feb-2026
Registration No
67/2026
Registration Date
18-Feb-2026
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, UDUPI
Judge
507-Prl District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
06-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 12-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.George Anil DSouza
Adv. ANANDA RAMAKRISHNA.RAO K
-
2.Reena Sylvia DSouza
Adv. Sharada N
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State, Udupi RAnge I Excise P.S, Rep by Public Prosecutor, Udupi
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Udupi allowed the anticipatory bail petition of George Anil D Souza and Reena Sylvia D Souza, who were accused of illegal liquor transportation under the Karnataka Excise Act. The court found that since the evidence (17 liters of liquor) was already seized, custodial interrogation was unnecessary, and the accused—with no criminal history and local residence—could be secured for trial. The petitioners were granted bail on Rs. 50,000 bond each with conditions including cooperation with investigation, regular trial attendance, and appearance before the investigating officer within 20 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Mar-2026
Disposed
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
04-Mar-2026
Orders
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Feb-2026
Orders
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
19-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 67/2026
The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Udupi allowed the anticipatory bail petition of George Anil D Souza and Reena Sylvia D Souza, who were accused of illegal liquor transportation under the Karnataka Excise Act. The court found that since the evidence (17 liters of liquor) was already seized, custodial interrogation was unnecessary, and the accused—with no criminal history and local residence—could be secured for trial. The petitioners were granted bail on Rs. 50,000 bond each with conditions including cooperation with investigation, regular trial attendance, and appearance before the investigating officer within 20 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts