Krishna Poojary vs The State, S.H.O, Malpe P.S, Rep by Public Prosecutor, Udupi — 64/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/Sec.482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 06th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAUP010002592026
Filing Number
63/2026
Filing Date
16-02-2026
Registration No
64/2026
Registration Date
16-02-2026
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, UDUPI
Judge
507-Prl District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Krishna Poojary
Adv. VIJAYA V POOJARY
Respondent(s)
The State, S.H.O, Malpe P.S, Rep by Public Prosecutor, Udupi
Sulochana
Hearing History
Judge: 507-Prl District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
ORDERS
ORDERS
BAIL
BAIL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 04-03-2026 | ORDERS |
| 25-02-2026 | ORDERS |
| 23-02-2026 | BAIL |
| 17-02-2026 | BAIL |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Udupi allowed the anticipatory bail petition of Krishna Poojary, who was accused under SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and various BNS sections involving allegations of financial fraud, threats, and outraging of modesty. The court found sufficient clouds over the truth of allegations, noting they appeared rooted in a financial dispute over a loan rather than genuine atrocity offenses, and concluded that despite the statutory bar on bail under the SC/ST Act, granting bail would advance justice. The petitioner was granted bail on Rs. 5,00,000 with standard conditions including cooperation with investigation and appearance before the IO within 20 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Udupi allowed the anticipatory bail petition of Krishna Poojary, who was accused under SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and various BNS sections involving allegations of financial fraud, threats, and outraging of modesty. The court found sufficient clouds over the truth of allegations, noting they appeared rooted in a financial dispute over a loan rather than genuine atrocity offenses, and concluded that despite the statutory bar on bail under the SC/ST Act, granting bail would advance justice. The petitioner was granted bail on Rs. 5,00,000 with standard conditions including cooperation with investigation and appearance before the IO within 20 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts