Krishna Poojary vs The State, S.H.O, Malpe P.S, Rep by Public Prosecutor, Udupi — 64/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/Sec.482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 06th March 2026.

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAUP010002592026

Case disposed

Filing Number

63/2026

Filing Date

16-02-2026

Registration No

64/2026

Registration Date

16-02-2026

Court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, UDUPI

Judge

507-Prl District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

06th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/Sec.482

Petitioner(s)

Krishna Poojary

Adv. VIJAYA V POOJARY

Respondent(s)

The State, S.H.O, Malpe P.S, Rep by Public Prosecutor, Udupi

Sulochana

Hearing History

Judge: 507-Prl District and Sessions Judge

06-03-2026

Disposed

04-03-2026

ORDERS

25-02-2026

ORDERS

23-02-2026

BAIL

17-02-2026

BAIL

Final Orders / Judgements

06-03-2026
Orders

Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Udupi allowed the anticipatory bail petition of Krishna Poojary, who was accused under SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and various BNS sections involving allegations of financial fraud, threats, and outraging of modesty. The court found sufficient clouds over the truth of allegations, noting they appeared rooted in a financial dispute over a loan rather than genuine atrocity offenses, and concluded that despite the statutory bar on bail under the SC/ST Act, granting bail would advance justice. The petitioner was granted bail on Rs. 5,00,000 with standard conditions including cooperation with investigation and appearance before the IO within 20 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Udupi allowed the anticipatory bail petition of Krishna Poojary, who was accused under SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and various BNS sections involving allegations of financial fraud, threats, and outraging of modesty. The court found sufficient clouds over the truth of allegations, noting they appeared rooted in a financial dispute over a loan rather than genuine atrocity offenses, and concluded that despite the statutory bar on bail under the SC/ST Act, granting bail would advance justice. The petitioner was granted bail on Rs. 5,00,000 with standard conditions including cooperation with investigation and appearance before the IO within 20 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, UDUPI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case