Mahesh vs The Managing Partner, M/S Raj Fishmeal and Oil Company,Udupi Advocate - Abhishesk Kaniyoor — 14/2021
Case under Industrial Disputes Act Section U/Sec.10-4A. Status: HEARING. Next hearing: 13th March 2026.
Ref.10.1.C.OF ID ACT
CNR: KAUP010000992021
Next Hearing
13th March 2026
Filing Number
14/2021
Filing Date
05-01-2021
Registration No
14/2021
Registration Date
19-01-2021
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, UDUPI
Judge
507-Prl District and Sessions Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mahesh
Adv. NAGARAJ.K
Respondent(s)
The Managing Partner, M/S Raj Fishmeal and Oil Company,Udupi Advocate - Abhishesk Kaniyoor
Hearing History
Judge: 507-Prl District and Sessions Judge
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
ORDERS
ORDERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 26-02-2026 | HEARING |
| 17-02-2026 | HEARING |
| 07-02-2026 | ORDERS |
| 30-01-2026 | ORDERS |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Principal District Judge of Udupi accepted the petitioner's memo and ruled that the burden of proof lies on the employer (respondent) to demonstrate that the domestic enquiry leading to the employee's termination was conducted validly and properly. The respondent has been directed to lead evidence at the first instance to prove the domestic enquiry's validity, following the Supreme Court's judgment in Kurukshethra University v. Pruthvi Singh (2018). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Principal District Judge of Udupi accepted the petitioner's memo and ruled that the burden of proof lies on the employer (respondent) to demonstrate that the domestic enquiry leading to the employee's termination was conducted validly and properly. The respondent has been directed to lead evidence at the first instance to prove the domestic enquiry's validity, following the Supreme Court's judgment in Kurukshethra University v. Pruthvi Singh (2018). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts