Ramesh K. vs The Managing Partner, M/S Raj Fishmeal and Oil Company, Udupi Advocate - Abhishesk Kaniyoor — 13/2021
Case under Industrial Disputes Act Section U/Sec.10-4A. Status: HEARING. Next hearing: 13th March 2026.
Ref.10.1.C.OF ID ACT
CNR: KAUP010000872021
Next Hearing
13th March 2026
Filing Number
13/2021
Filing Date
04-01-2021
Registration No
13/2021
Registration Date
19-01-2021
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, UDUPI
Judge
507-Prl District and Sessions Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ramesh K.
Adv. NAGARAJ.K
Respondent(s)
The Managing Partner, M/S Raj Fishmeal and Oil Company, Udupi Advocate - Abhishesk Kaniyoor
Hearing History
Judge: 507-Prl District and Sessions Judge
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
ORDERS
ORDERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 26-02-2026 | HEARING |
| 17-02-2026 | HEARING |
| 07-02-2026 | ORDERS |
| 30-01-2026 | ORDERS |
Interim Orders
Summary Case ID: I.D 13/2021 R.W. 1 Date: 26-08-2023 The court found multiple procedural irregularities in the internal inquiry conducted against the petitioner (an employee/sweeper). The court held that the petitioner was not given proper notice of charges, adequate time to respond, or fair opportunity to cross-examine witnesses. The inquiry officer did not properly document the petitioner's statement and violated natural justice principles. The court set aside the one-sided inquiry report and directed a fresh, fair inquiry to be conducted with proper procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary Case ID: I.D 13/2021 R.W. 1 Date: 26-08-2023 The court found multiple procedural irregularities in the internal inquiry conducted against the petitioner (an employee/sweeper). The court held that the petitioner was not given proper notice of charges, adequate time to respond, or fair opportunity to cross-examine witnesses. The inquiry officer did not properly document the petitioner's statement and violated natural justice principles. The court set aside the one-sided inquiry report and directed a fresh, fair inquiry to be conducted with proper procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts