Peter Rodrigues vs The Managing Partner, M/S Raj Fishmeal and Oil Company, Udupi Advocate - Abhishesk Kaniyoor — 10/2021

Case under Industrial Disputes Act Section U/Sec.10-4A. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 13th March 2026.

Hearing Next hearing 13-Mar-2026 this date has passed

Ref.10.1.C.OF ID ACT

CNR: KAUP010000842021

Filing Number

10/2021

Filing Date

04-Jan-2021

Registration No

10/2021

Registration Date

19-Jan-2021

Court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, UDUPI

Judge

507-Prl District and Sessions Judge

Last updated 12-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Industrial Disputes Act Section U/Sec.10-4A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Peter Rodrigues

    Adv. NAGARAJ.K

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Managing Partner, M/S Raj Fishmeal and Oil Company, Udupi Advocate - Abhishesk Kaniyoor

Case History

  1. 13-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  3. 26-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  4. 17-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  5. 07-Feb-2026

    Orders

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  6. 30-Jan-2026

    Orders

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  7. 22-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  8. 20-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  9. 09-Jan-2026

    Orders

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  10. 19-Dec-2025

    Orders

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  11. 17-Dec-2025

    Orders

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  12. 10-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  13. 04-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  14. 26-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  15. 15-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  16. 06-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  17. 24-Oct-2025

    Orders

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  18. 10-Oct-2025

    Orders

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  19. 29-Sep-2025

    Orders

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  20. 27-Sep-2025

    Orders

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  21. 23-Sep-2025

    Orders

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  22. 15-Sep-2025

    Orders

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  23. 08-Sep-2025

    Orders

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  24. 29-Aug-2025

    Orders

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  25. 19-Aug-2025

    Orders

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  26. 06-Aug-2025

    Orders

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  27. 28-Jul-2025

    Orders

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  28. 17-Jul-2025

    Orders

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  29. 04-Jul-2025

    Orders

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  30. 20-Jun-2025

    Hearing

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  31. 13-Jun-2025

    Hearing

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  32. 12-May-2025

    Hearing

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  33. 05-May-2025

    Hearing

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  34. 21-Apr-2025

    Hearing

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  35. 11-Apr-2025

    Hearing

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  36. 29-Mar-2025

    Hearing

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  37. 18-Mar-2025

    Hearing

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  38. 04-Mar-2025

    Hearing

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  39. 13-Feb-2025

    Hearing

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  40. 01-Feb-2025

    Hearing

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  41. 27-Jan-2025

    Hearing

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  42. 24-Jan-2025

    Hearing

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  43. 10-Jan-2025

    Hearing

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  44. 04-Jan-2025

    Hearing

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  45. 20-Dec-2024

    Hearing

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  46. 06-Dec-2024

    Hearing

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  47. 26-Nov-2024

    Hearing

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  48. 15-Nov-2024

    Hearing

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  49. 28-Oct-2024

    Hearing

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  50. 19-Oct-2024

    Hearing

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  51. 04-Oct-2024

    Hearing

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  52. 20-Sep-2024

    Hearing

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  53. 04-Sep-2024

    Hearing

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  54. 24-Aug-2024

    Hearing

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  55. 13-Aug-2024

    Hearing

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  56. 01-Aug-2024

    Hearing

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  57. 12-Jul-2024

    Hearing

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  58. 02-Jul-2024

    Hearing

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  59. 20-Jun-2024

    Hearing

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  60. 22-Apr-2024

    Hearing

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  61. 08-Apr-2024

    Orders

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  62. 25-Mar-2024

    Arguments

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  63. 06-Mar-2024

    Arguments

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  64. 17-Feb-2024

    Arguments

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  65. 20-Jan-2024

    Arguments

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  66. 05-Dec-2023

    Arguments

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  67. 25-Nov-2023

    Arguments

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  68. 02-Nov-2023

    Arguments

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  69. 23-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  70. 26-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  71. 15-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  72. 24-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  73. 02-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  74. 01-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  75. 19-Apr-2023

    Evidence

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  76. 05-Apr-2023

    Evidence

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  77. 21-Mar-2023

    Evidence

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  78. 20-Feb-2023

    Evidence

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  79. 18-Jan-2023

    Evidence

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  80. 08-Dec-2022

    Evidence

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  81. 16-Nov-2022

    Evidence

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  82. 21-Oct-2022

    Evidence

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  83. 21-Sep-2022

    Evidence

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  84. 25-Aug-2022

    Evidence

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  85. 22-Jul-2022

    OrdersView PDF

    SUMMARY The petitioner's memo was accepted. The tribunal directed the respondent-employer to lead evidence first to prove that the domestic enquiry conducted against the petitioner was valid and proper, following Supreme Court precedent (Kurukshethra University v. Pruthvi Singh) which places the burden of proof on the management, not the employee. The validity of the domestic enquiry is a preliminary issue that must be decided at the first instance before considering the appropriateness of the termination sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  86. 22-Jul-2022

    Evidence

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  87. 08-Jul-2022

    Orders

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  88. 02-Jul-2022

    Arguments

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  89. 04-Jun-2022

    Arguments

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  90. 05-Apr-2022

    Arguments

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  91. 21-Mar-2022

    Arguments

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  92. 14-Feb-2022

    Hearing

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  93. 03-Feb-2022

    Hearing

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  94. 16-Dec-2021

    Hearing

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  95. 21-Oct-2021

    Evidence

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  96. 19-Oct-2021

    Evidence

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  97. 07-Sep-2021

    Evidence

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  98. 17-Aug-2021

    IssueView PDF

  99. 17-Aug-2021

    Evidence

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  100. 15-Jul-2021

    IssueView PDF

  101. 15-Jul-2021

    Evidence

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  102. 08-Jun-2021

    Evidence

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  103. 07-Apr-2021

    Evidence

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  104. 04-Mar-2021

    Summons

    Prl District and Sessions Judge

  105. 20-Jan-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  106. 04-Jan-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 10/2021

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY The petitioner's memo was accepted. The tribunal directed the respondent-employer to lead evidence first to prove that the domestic enquiry conducted against the petitioner was valid and proper, following Supreme Court precedent (Kurukshethra University v. Pruthvi Singh) which places the burden of proof on the management, not the employee. The validity of the domestic enquiry is a preliminary issue that must be decided at the first instance before considering the appropriateness of the termination sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case