Stephen Rodrigues vs The Managing Partner, M/S Raj Fishmeal and Oil Company, Udupi Advocate - Abhishesk Kaniyoor — 8/2021
Case under Industrial Disputes Act Section U/Sec.10-4A. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 13th March 2026.
Ref.10.1.C.OF ID ACT
CNR: KAUP010000822021
Filing Number
8/2021
Filing Date
04-Jan-2021
Registration No
8/2021
Registration Date
19-Jan-2021
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, UDUPI
Judge
507-Prl District and Sessions Judge
Last updated 12-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Stephen Rodrigues
Adv. NAGARAJ.K
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Managing Partner, M/S Raj Fishmeal and Oil Company, Udupi Advocate - Abhishesk Kaniyoor
Case History
-
13-Mar-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
26-Feb-2026
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
17-Feb-2026
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
07-Feb-2026
Orders
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
30-Jan-2026
Orders
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
22-Jan-2026
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
20-Jan-2026
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Jan-2026
Orders
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
19-Dec-2025
Orders
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
17-Dec-2025
Orders
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Dec-2025
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
04-Dec-2025
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
26-Nov-2025
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
15-Nov-2025
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
06-Nov-2025
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Oct-2025
Orders
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Oct-2025
Orders
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
29-Sep-2025
Orders
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
27-Sep-2025
Orders
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
23-Sep-2025
Orders
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
15-Sep-2025
Orders
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
08-Sep-2025
Orders
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
29-Aug-2025
Orders
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
19-Aug-2025
Orders
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
06-Aug-2025
Orders
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
28-Jul-2025
Orders
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
17-Jul-2025
Orders
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
04-Jul-2025
Orders
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
20-Jun-2025
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Jun-2025
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
12-May-2025
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
05-May-2025
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
21-Apr-2025
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Apr-2025
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
29-Mar-2025
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
18-Mar-2025
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
04-Mar-2025
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Feb-2025
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
01-Feb-2025
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
27-Jan-2025
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Jan-2025
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Jan-2025
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
04-Jan-2025
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
20-Dec-2024
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
06-Dec-2024
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
26-Nov-2024
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
15-Nov-2024
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
28-Oct-2024
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
19-Oct-2024
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
04-Oct-2024
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
20-Sep-2024
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
04-Sep-2024
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Aug-2024
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Aug-2024
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
01-Aug-2024
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Jul-2024
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
02-Jul-2024
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
20-Jun-2024
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
22-Apr-2024
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
08-Apr-2024
Orders
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Mar-2024
Arguments
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
06-Mar-2024
Arguments
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
17-Feb-2024
Arguments
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
20-Jan-2024
Arguments
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
05-Dec-2023
Arguments
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Nov-2023
Arguments
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
02-Nov-2023
Arguments
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
23-Sep-2023
Evidence
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
26-Aug-2023
Evidence
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
15-Jul-2023
Evidence
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Jun-2023
Evidence
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
02-Jun-2023
Evidence
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
01-Jun-2023
Evidence
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
19-Apr-2023
Evidence
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
05-Apr-2023
Evidence
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
21-Mar-2023
Evidence
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
20-Feb-2023
Evidence
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
18-Jan-2023
Evidence
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
08-Dec-2022
Evidence
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
16-Nov-2022
Evidence
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
21-Oct-2022
Evidence
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
21-Sep-2022
Evidence
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Aug-2022
Evidence
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
22-Jul-2022
OrdersView PDF
Summary: The Principal District Judge of Udupi accepted the petitioner's memo and ruled that the burden of proof lies on the employer (respondent) to demonstrate that the domestic enquiry conducted for the employee's termination was valid and proper. The respondent has been directed to lead evidence at the first instance to prove the validity of the domestic enquiry, following the Supreme Court's judgment in Kurukshethra University v. Pruthvi Singh. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-Jul-2022
Evidence CIVIL
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
08-Jul-2022
Orders
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
02-Jul-2022
Arguments
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
04-Jun-2022
Arguments
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
05-Apr-2022
Arguments
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
21-Mar-2022
Arguments
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
14-Feb-2022
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
03-Feb-2022
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
16-Dec-2021
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
21-Oct-2021
Evidence
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
19-Oct-2021
Evidence
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
07-Sep-2021
Evidence
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
17-Aug-2021
IssueView PDF
-
17-Aug-2021
Evidence
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
15-Jul-2021
IssueView PDF
-
15-Jul-2021
Evidence
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
08-Jun-2021
Evidence
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
07-Apr-2021
Evidence
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
04-Mar-2021
Summons
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
20-Jan-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Jan-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 8/2021
Summary: The Principal District Judge of Udupi accepted the petitioner's memo and ruled that the burden of proof lies on the employer (respondent) to demonstrate that the domestic enquiry conducted for the employee's termination was valid and proper. The respondent has been directed to lead evidence at the first instance to prove the validity of the domestic enquiry, following the Supreme Court's judgment in Kurukshethra University v. Pruthvi Singh. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts