Rama vs The Managing Partner, M/S Raj Fishmeal and Oil Company, Udupi Advocate - Abhishesk Kaniyoor — 7/2021
Case under Industrial Disputes Act Section U/Sec.10-4A. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 13th March 2026.
Ref.10.1.C.OF ID ACT
CNR: KAUP010000812021
Filing Number
7/2021
Filing Date
04-Jan-2021
Registration No
7/2021
Registration Date
18-Jan-2021
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, UDUPI
Judge
507-Prl District and Sessions Judge
Last updated 12-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Rama
Adv. NAGARAJ.K
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Managing Partner, M/S Raj Fishmeal and Oil Company, Udupi Advocate - Abhishesk Kaniyoor
Case History
-
13-Mar-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
26-Feb-2026
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
17-Feb-2026
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
07-Feb-2026
Orders
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
30-Jan-2026
Orders
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
22-Jan-2026
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
20-Jan-2026
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Jan-2026
Orders
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
19-Dec-2025
Orders
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
17-Dec-2025
Orders
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Dec-2025
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
04-Dec-2025
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
26-Nov-2025
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
15-Nov-2025
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
06-Nov-2025
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Oct-2025
Orders
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Oct-2025
Orders
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
29-Sep-2025
Orders
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
27-Sep-2025
Orders
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
23-Sep-2025
Orders
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
15-Sep-2025
Orders
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
08-Sep-2025
Orders
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
29-Aug-2025
Orders
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
19-Aug-2025
Orders
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
06-Aug-2025
Orders
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
28-Jul-2025
Orders
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
17-Jul-2025
Orders
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
04-Jul-2025
Orders
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
20-Jun-2025
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Jun-2025
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
12-May-2025
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
05-May-2025
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
21-Apr-2025
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Apr-2025
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
29-Mar-2025
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
18-Mar-2025
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
04-Mar-2025
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Feb-2025
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
01-Feb-2025
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
27-Jan-2025
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Jan-2025
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Jan-2025
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
04-Jan-2025
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
20-Dec-2024
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
06-Dec-2024
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
26-Nov-2024
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
15-Nov-2024
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
28-Oct-2024
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
19-Oct-2024
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
04-Oct-2024
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
20-Sep-2024
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
04-Sep-2024
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Aug-2024
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Aug-2024
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
01-Aug-2024
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Jul-2024
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
02-Jul-2024
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
20-Jun-2024
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
22-Apr-2024
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
08-Apr-2024
Orders
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Mar-2024
Arguments
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
06-Mar-2024
Arguments
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
17-Feb-2024
Arguments
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
20-Jan-2024
Arguments
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
05-Dec-2023
Arguments
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Nov-2023
Arguments
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
02-Nov-2023
Arguments
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
23-Sep-2023
Evidence
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
26-Aug-2023
Evidence
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
15-Jul-2023
Evidence
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Jun-2023
Evidence
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
02-Jun-2023
Evidence
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
01-Jun-2023
Evidence
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
19-Apr-2023
Evidence
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
05-Apr-2023
Evidence
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
21-Mar-2023
Evidence
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
20-Feb-2023
Evidence
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
18-Jan-2023
Evidence
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
08-Dec-2022
Evidence
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
16-Nov-2022
Evidence
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
21-Oct-2022
Evidence
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
21-Sep-2022
Evidence
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Aug-2022
Evidence
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
22-Jul-2022
OrdersView PDF
Summary: The Principal District Judge of Udupi accepted the petitioner's memo and held that the burden of proof lies on the employer (respondent) to demonstrate the validity and propriety of the domestic enquiry that led to the employee's termination. The court directed the respondent to lead evidence at the first instance to prove the domestic enquiry was valid and proper, relying on the Supreme Court's judgment in Kurukshethra University vs. Pruthvi Singh (2018 4 SCC 483), which established that the validity of a domestic enquiry is a preliminary issue requiring management's evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-Jul-2022
Evidence CIVIL
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
08-Jul-2022
Orders
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
02-Jul-2022
Arguments
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
04-Jun-2022
Arguments
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
05-Apr-2022
Arguments
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
21-Mar-2022
Arguments
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
14-Feb-2022
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
03-Feb-2022
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
16-Dec-2021
Hearing
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
21-Oct-2021
Evidence
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
19-Oct-2021
Evidence
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
07-Sep-2021
Evidence
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
17-Aug-2021
IssueView PDF
-
17-Aug-2021
Evidence
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
15-Jul-2021
IssueView PDF
-
15-Jul-2021
Evidence
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
08-Jun-2021
Evidence
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
07-Apr-2021
Evidence
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
04-Mar-2021
Summons
Prl District and Sessions Judge
-
19-Jan-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Jan-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 7/2021
Summary: The Principal District Judge of Udupi accepted the petitioner's memo and held that the burden of proof lies on the employer (respondent) to demonstrate the validity and propriety of the domestic enquiry that led to the employee's termination. The court directed the respondent to lead evidence at the first instance to prove the domestic enquiry was valid and proper, relying on the Supreme Court's judgment in Kurukshethra University vs. Pruthvi Singh (2018 4 SCC 483), which established that the validity of a domestic enquiry is a preliminary issue requiring management's evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts