Rathnakar Shenoy vs The Managing Partner, M/S Raj Fishmeal and Oil Company, Udupi Advocate - Abhishesk Kaniyoor — 4/2021
Case under Industrial Disputes Act Section U/Sec.10-4A. Status: HEARING. Next hearing: 13th March 2026.
Ref.10.1.C.OF ID ACT
CNR: KAUP010000782021
Next Hearing
13th March 2026
Filing Number
4/2021
Filing Date
04-01-2021
Registration No
4/2021
Registration Date
18-01-2021
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, UDUPI
Judge
507-Prl District and Sessions Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rathnakar Shenoy
Adv. NAGARAJ.K
Respondent(s)
The Managing Partner, M/S Raj Fishmeal and Oil Company, Udupi Advocate - Abhishesk Kaniyoor
Hearing History
Judge: 507-Prl District and Sessions Judge
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
ORDERS
ORDERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 26-02-2026 | HEARING |
| 17-02-2026 | HEARING |
| 07-02-2026 | ORDERS |
| 30-01-2026 | ORDERS |
Interim Orders
Summary: In this Revision Petition (R.W. 1) case bearing I.D 4/2021, heard on 15-07-2023 by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Udupi, the court examined mobile/laptop bills and related documents presented by the respondent's counsel. The petitioner's counsel objected that certain documents (Marks A-39 and A-40) and evidence under Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act were not properly presented during the internal inquiry. The court found the objection regarding non-presentation of documents during internal inquiry to be without merit, and the revision petition was dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In this Revision Petition (R.W. 1) case bearing I.D 4/2021, heard on 15-07-2023 by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Udupi, the court examined mobile/laptop bills and related documents presented by the respondent's counsel. The petitioner's counsel objected that certain documents (Marks A-39 and A-40) and evidence under Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act were not properly presented during the internal inquiry. The court found the objection regarding non-presentation of documents during internal inquiry to be without merit, and the revision petition was dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts